Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35391616›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2022

Prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention diastolic pressure ratio.

K Masdjedi, L J C van Zandvoort, T Neleman, I Kardys, J Ligthart, W K Den Dekker, R Diletti, F Zijlstra, N M Van Mieghem, J Daemen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pressure gradient post-percutaneous coronary intervention: beyond angiography.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

K MasdjediDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L J C van ZandvoortDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
T NelemanDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
I KardysDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J LigthartDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W K Den DekkerDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R DilettiDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
F ZijlstraDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N M Van MieghemDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J DaemenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.daemen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-1410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the distribution of a generic diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) after angiographically successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to assess its association with the 2‑year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel revascularisation, target vessel myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis.

methodsThe dPR SEARCH study is a post hoc analysis of the prospective single-centre FFR-SEARCH registry, in which physiological assessment was performed after angiographically successful PCI in a total of 1000 patients, using a dedicated microcatheter. dPR was calculated offline with recently validated software in a subset of 735 patients.

resultsMean post-PCI dPR was 0.95 ± 0.06. Post-PCI dPR was ≤ 0.89 in 15.2% of the patients. The cumulative incidence of TVF at 2‑year follow-up was 9.4% in patients with a final post-PCI dPR ≤ 0.89 as compared to 6.1% in patients with a post-PCI dPR > 0.89 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for dPR ≤ 0.89: 1.53; 95% CI 0.74-3.13; p = 0.249). dPR ≤ 0.89 was associated with significantly higher cardiac mortality at 2 years; adjusted HR 2.40; 95% CI 1.01-5.68; p = 0.047.

conclusionsIn a real-world setting, despite optimal angiographic PCI results, 15.2% of the patients had a final post-PCI dPR of ≤ 0.89, which was associated with a higher incidence of TVF and a significantly higher cardiac mortality rate.

Indexed as

Coronary physiologyDiastolic pressure ratioNon-hyperaemic pressure ratio

Identifiers

PMID35391616
PMCPMC9270544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.