ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2022
Identification of Chemical-Disease Associations Through Integration of Molecular Fingerprint, Gene Ontology and Pathway Information.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of chemical-disease association types is helpful not only to discovery lead compounds and study drug repositioning, but also to treat disease and decipher pathomechanism. It is very urgent to develop computational method for identifying potential chemical-disease association types, since wet methods are usually expensive, laborious and time-consuming. In this study, molecular fingerprint, gene ontology and pathway are utilized to characterize chemicals and diseases. A novel predictor is proposed to recognize potential chemical-disease associations at the first layer, and further distinguish whether their relationships belong to biomarker or therapeutic relations at the second layer. The prediction performance of current method is assessed using the benchmark dataset based on ten-fold cross-validation. The practical prediction accuracies of the first layer and the second layer are 78.47% and 72.07%, respectively. The recognition ability for lead compounds, new drug indications, potential and true chemical-disease association pairs has also been investigated and confirmed by constructing a variety of datasets and performing a series of experiments. It is anticipated that the current method can be considered as a powerful high-throughput virtual screening tool for drug researches and developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.