ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Patient-centeredness].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Self-Help Orientation Among German Rehabilitation Clinics: Website Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Patient perspectives in neurosurgery: the role of patient-reported experience measures (PREM) in enhancing care quality.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Patient-centeredness-a cultural targeted survey among junior medical managers.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Development of individual competencies and team performance in interprofessional ward rounds: results of a study with multimodal observations at the Heidelberg Interprofessional Training Ward.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-centeredness has developed into the guiding principle of healthcare policy over the last decade. However, its practical implementation is hindered by numerous problems and opposing interests.
objectiveTo define and elucidate the term patient-centeredness, describe evidence-based measurement tools and outline recommendations for practical implementation. MATERIAL AND
methodsA narrative literature review was carried out in Medline, Cochrane Library, PsyINfo and CINHAL. Based on the results the concept of Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) is explained and a comprehensive PREM system is developed.
resultsPatient-centeredness is a not yet clearly defined theoretical construct. Patient-centeredness covers up to 16 different aspects ranging from patient involvement to the transition of care. Patient centeredness is most frequently measured via PREMs. Contrary to other countries, there are only a limited number of validated PREMs available in German and measurement qualities are frequently unclear or insufficient. No comprehensive PREM system has been developed for the German language so far. Important aspects of surgical care are not captured by currently available German language PREMs.
conclusionContrary to other countries no comprehensive PREM system is available in the German language. Currently available German PREMs do not enable the adequate assessment of surgical aspects of care. Important organizational, regulatory, methodological, and financial aspects must be addressed before patient-centeredness can be implemented into every clinical practice in German-speaking countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.