Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35390537›Full record

SynthesisJournal of sport and health science2023

The measurement of proprioceptive accuracy: A systematic literature review.

Áron Horváth, Eszter Ferentzi, Kristóf Schwartz, Nina Jacobs, Pieter Meyns, Ferenc Köteles

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of sport and health science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Clarifying Proprioceptive Training: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Measuring position sense.Experimental physiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Áron HorváthDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Kazinczy street 23-27, Budapest 1075, Hungary; Institute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Prielle Kornélia Street 47-49, Budapest 1117, Hungary. Electronic address: horvath.aron@ppk.elte.hu.
Eszter FerentziInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Prielle Kornélia Street 47-49, Budapest 1117, Hungary.
Kristóf SchwartzDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Kazinczy street 23-27, Budapest 1075, Hungary; Institute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Prielle Kornélia Street 47-49, Budapest 1117, Hungary.
Nina JacobsRehabilitation Research (REVAL), Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Martelarenlaan 42, Hasselt 3500, Belgium.
Pieter MeynsRehabilitation Research (REVAL), Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Martelarenlaan 42, Hasselt 3500, Belgium.
Ferenc KötelesInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Prielle Kornélia Street 47-49, Budapest 1117, Hungary.
Eötvös Loránd University · HUHasselt University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProprioceptive accuracy refers to the individual's ability to perceive proprioceptive information, that is, the information referring to the actual state of the locomotor system, which originates from mechanoreceptors located in various parts of the locomotor system and from tactile receptors located in the skin. Proprioceptive accuracy appears to be an important aspect in the evaluation of sensorimotor functioning; however, no widely accepted standard assessment exists. In this systematic review, our goal was to identify and categorize different methods that are used to assess different aspects of proprioceptive accuracy.

methodsA literature search was conducted in 5 different databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink).

resultsOverall, 1139 scientific papers reporting 1346 methods were included in this review. The methods assess 8 different aspects of proprioception: (a) the perception of joint position, (b) movement and movement extent, (c) trajectory, (d) velocity, and the sense of (e) force, (f) muscle tension, (g) weight, and (h) size. They apply various paradigms of psychophysics (i.e., the method of adjustment, constant stimuli, and limits).

conclusionAs the outcomes of different tasks with respect to various body parts show no associations (i.e., proprioceptive accuracy is characterized by site-specificity and method-specificity), the appropriate measurement method for the task needs to be chosen based on theoretical considerations and/or ecological validity.

Indexed as

MovementProprioceptionAssessmentKinesthesiaMotor controlProprioceptionProprioceptive accuracy

Identifiers

PMID35390537
PMCPMC10105016
OpenAlexW4226109968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.