Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35390282›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Implicit mechanisms of intention.

Tyson Aflalo, Carey Zhang, Boris Revechkis, Emily Rosario, Nader Pouratian, Richard A Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Decoding speech intent from non-frontal cortical areas.Journal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Making sense of feelings.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024
    Article
  7. What is the intention to move and when does it occur?Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyson AflaloCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; California Institute of Technology, Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, 1200 E California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. Electronic address: tyson.aflalo@gmail.com.
Carey ZhangCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Boris RevechkisCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Emily RosarioCasa Colina Hospital and Centers for Rehabilitation, 255 E Bonita Ave, Pomona, CA 91767, USA.
Nader PouratianUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Richard A AndersenCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; California Institute of Technology, Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Brain-Machine Interface Center, 1200 E California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Funding

Smart MEMS recording systems for visual cortical studiesR01EY015545 · NEI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 2005 to 2020
$9.6M
Visuomotor Prosthetic for ParalysisUG1EY032039 · NEI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI RICHARD A ANDERSEN · 2021 to 2026
$4.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015545NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY032039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-level cortical regions encode motor decisions before or even absent awareness, suggesting that neural processes predetermine behavior before conscious choice. Such early neural encoding challenges popular conceptions of human agency. It also raises fundamental questions for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) that traditionally assume that neural activity reflects the user's conscious intentions. Here, we study the timing of human posterior parietal cortex single-neuron activity recorded from implanted microelectrode arrays relative to the explicit urge to initiate movement. Participants were free to choose when to move, whether to move, and what to move, and they retrospectively reported the time they felt the urge to move. We replicate prior studies by showing that posterior parietal cortex (PPC) neural activity sharply rises hundreds of milliseconds before the reported urge. However, we find that this "preconscious" activity is part of a dynamic neural population response that initiates much earlier, when the participant first chooses to perform the task. Together with details of neural timing, our results suggest that PPC encodes an internal model of the motor planning network that transforms high-level task objectives into appropriate motor behavior. These new data challenge traditional interpretations of early neural activity and offer a more holistic perspective on the interplay between choice, behavior, and their neural underpinnings. Our results have important implications for translating BMIs into more complex real-world environments. We find that early neural dynamics are sufficient to drive BMI movements before the participant intends to initiate movement. Appropriate algorithms ensure that BMI movements align with the subject's awareness of choice.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesIntentionHumansMovementParietal LobeRetrospective Studiesawareness of intentbrain-machine interfacedecisionLibetmotor planningposterior parietal cortexreadiness potentialself-initiated actionvolition

Identifiers

PMID35390282
PMCPMC9090994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.