Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35390141›Full record

ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2022

Efficacy and Safety of Elective Switching from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Infliximab [CT-P13]: A Multicentre Cohort Study.

Philip J Smith, Lisa Critchley, Daniel Storey, Belle Gregg, June Stenson, Andrew Kneebone, Tracy Rimmer, Stevena Burke, Shamas Hussain, Wan Yi Teoh and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip J SmithDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1568-3978
Lisa CritchleyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel StoreyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8101-8429
Belle GreggDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
June StensonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew KneeboneDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Tracy RimmerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Stevena BurkeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Shamas HussainLiverpool School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Wan Yi TeohLiverpool School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stephan VazeilleLiverpool School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Solange SernaDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-3738
Alan SteelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1854-7533
Edmund DerbyshireDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0591-1458
Paul CollinsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Martyn DibbDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2062-6185
Paul FlanaganDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9215-336X
Christopher ProbertDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-0239
Ajay M VermaDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-3357
Sreedhar SubramanianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6483-1730
University of Liverpool · GBKettering General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravenous [IV] infliximab is a well-established therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] patients. A subcutaneous [SC] formulation of infliximab [CT-P13] has recently been shown to be as effective as IV infliximab after two doses of IV induction in a randomised trial, but there are no data to support elective switching of patients on maintenance IV infliximab therapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an elective switching programme to SC CT-P13 in patients treated with IV infliximab.

methodsPatients on established maintenance IV infliximab, who switched to SC CT-P13, were included in this retrospective multicentre cohort study. Disease activity was monitored serially with the Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] for Crohn's disease [CD] and the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] for ulcerative colitis (UC) for up to 12 months at months 3, 6, and 12. Faecal calprotectin [FC] and C-reactive protein [CRP] were recorded at baseline and follow-up, if available. Infliximab trough levels were measured prior to switch and at months 3, 6, and 12 following switch. The primary outcome measure was treatment persistence at latest follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included infliximab pharmacokinetics [PK], safety, need for corticosteroid rescue therapy, and need for surgery.

resultsWe included 181 patients, of whom 115 [63.5%] had CD. The majority [72.4%] were on 8-weekly dosing of intravenous infliximab prior to switching, and more than half [59.1%] were on concomitant immunomodulatory therapy. The majority of patients (CD: 106, 92.2%; UC: 46, 76.7%; and IBD unclassified [IBD-U]: 5, 83.3%) were in clinical remission. Treatment persistence rate was high [n = 167, 92.3%] and only 14 patients [7.7%] stopped treatment during the follow-up period. There was no significant difference between baseline and repeat measurements at 3, 6, or 12 months for HBI, SCCAI, CRP, or FC. Of the total cohort, 25 patients (13.8%) had perianal CD. Of these, only two patients [8%] had worsening of perianal CD and required antibiotic therapy and further examination under anaesthesia [EUA]. Both these patients also switched back to intravenous infliximab. Median infliximab level increased from a baseline of 8.9 µg/dl [range 0.4-16] to 16.0 µg/dl [range 2.3-16, p <0.001] at 3 months. Serum levels stayed stable at 6 months [median 16 µg/dl, range 0.3-17.2] and 12 months [median 16 µg/dl, range 0.3-19.1, both p <0.001 compared with baseline]. Among the variables examined, only antibodies to infliximab [ATI] was associated with infliximab levels (odds ratio [OR] -13.369, 95% CI -15.405, -11.333, p <0.001]. A total of 14 patients [7.7%] developed ATI; of these, nine [64.3%] were on concomitant immunomodulatory therapy. Immunomodulatory therapy was not significantly associated with development of ATI [p = 0.15]. In a subset of patients receiving escalated IV infliximab dosing frequency prior to switching, no difference in treatment persistence was observed in patients receiving weekly versus alternate weekly SC CT-P13. Patient acceptance and satisfaction rates with SC CT-P13 were very high.

conclusionsAmong patients on IV infliximab maintenance therapy switched to SC CT-P13, we observed high treatment persistence rates and low rates of immunogenicity, with no change in clinical disease activity indices or biomarkers. Infliximab levels increased after switch to SC CT-P13, and only ATI was associated with serum infliximab levels. Patient acceptance and satisfaction rates were high with SC CT-P13.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsColitisColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAntibodies, MonoclonalCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinDrug SubstitutionGastrointestinal AgentsHumansInfliximabLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsC-Reactive ProteinCT-P13Gastrointestinal AgentsInfliximabLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexanti-tumour necrosis factor antibodyCrohn’s diseaseCT-P13efficacyInflammatory bowel diseaseinfliximabsubcutaneousswitchulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID35390141
PMCPMC9455786
OpenAlexW4225363052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.