Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35390102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

CHARM: COVID-19 Health Action Response for Marines-Association of antigen-specific interferon-gamma and IL2 responses with asymptomatic and symptomatic infections after a positive qPCR SARS-CoV-2 test.

Martha Sedegah, Chad Porter, Michael R Hollingdale, Harini Ganeshan, Jun Huang, Carl W Goforth, Maria Belmonte, Arnel Belmonte, Dawn L Weir, Rhonda A Lizewski and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Martha SedegahAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6385-508X
Chad PorterVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Michael R HollingdaleAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2343-3824
Harini GaneshanAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Jun HuangAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Carl W GoforthVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Maria BelmonteAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4103-6611
Arnel BelmonteAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Dawn L WeirVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5653-8905
Rhonda A LizewskiU.S. Naval Medical Research Unit SIX, Lima, Perú.
Stephen E LizewskiU.S. Naval Medical Research Unit SIX, Lima, Perú.
Stuart C SealfonIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America.
Vihasi JaniVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Ying ChengVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Sandra InoueAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Rachael VelascoAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Eileen VillasanteAgile Vaccines and Therapeutics Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Peifang SunVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.
Andrew G LetiziaVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7361-5917
Naval Medical Research Command · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USUnited States Naval Medical Research Unit SOUTH · PEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLeidos (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses are associated with COVID-19 recovery, and Class I- and Class II-restricted epitopes have been identified in the spike (S), nucleocapsid (N) and membrane (M) proteins and others. This prospective COVID-19 Health Action Response for Marines (CHARM) study enabled assessment of T cell responses against S, N and M proteins in symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected participants. At enrollment all participants were negative by qPCR; follow-up occurred biweekly and bimonthly for the next 6 weeks. Study participants who tested positive by qPCR SARS-CoV-2 test were enrolled in an immune response sub-study. FluoroSpot interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and IL2 responses following qPCR-confirmed infection at enrollment (day 0), day 7 and 14 and more than 28 days later were measured using pools of 17mer peptides covering S, N, and M proteins, or CD4+CD8 peptide pools containing predicted epitopes from multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Among 124 asymptomatic and 105 symptomatic participants, SARS-CoV-2 infection generated IFN-γ responses to the S, N and M proteins that persisted longer in asymptomatic cases. IFN-γ responses were significantly (p = 0.001) more frequent to the N pool (51.4%) than the M pool (18.9%) among asymptomatic but not symptomatic subjects. Asymptomatic IFN-γ responders to the CD4+CD8 pool responded more frequently to the S pool (55.6%) and N pool (57.1%), than the M pool (7.1%), but not symptomatic participants. The frequencies of IFN-γ responses to the S and N+M pools peaked 7 days after the positive qPCR test among asymptomatic (S pool: 22.2%; N+M pool: 28.7%) and symptomatic (S pool: 15.3%; N+M pool 21.9%) participants and dropped by >28 days. Magnitudes of post-infection IFN-γ and IL2 responses to the N+M pool were significantly correlated with IFN-γ and IL2 responses to the N and M pools. These data further support the central role of Th1-biased cell mediated immunity IFN-γ and IL2 responses, particularly to the N protein, in controlling COVID-19 symptoms, and justify T cell-based COVID-19 vaccines that include the N and S proteins.

Indexed as

COVID-19Interferon-gammaInterleukin-2Antibodies, ViralAsymptomatic InfectionsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopesHumansMilitary PersonnelSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopesInterferon-gammaInterleukin-2Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35390102
PMCPMC8989306
OpenAlexW4226169234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.