Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35390098›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women aged 25-60 years in Lao People's Democratic Republic.

Jom Phaiphichit, Phimpha Paboriboune, Sengchan Kunnavong, Phetsavanh Chanthavilay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jom PhaiphichitLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Phimpha PaboribouneCenter Infectiology Lao Christophe-Mérieux (CILM), Ministry of Health, Kaoyod Village, Sisatanak District, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR.
Sengchan KunnavongLao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kaoyod Village, Sisatanak District, Vientiane, Laos.
Phetsavanh ChanthavilayInstitute of Research and Education Development, University of Health Sciences, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR.ORCID 0000-0002-8982-6874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite cervical cancer being a major public health concern in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), screening coverage is very low. The reasons and factors for this are unknown. This study aimed to identify factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women aged 25-60 years.

methodsThe case-control study was conducted among women aged 25-60 years in Vientiane Capital and Luang Prabang province from March 15 to May 31, 2018. A total of 360 women were included in the study, a ratio of two controls per case. The cases were women who had undergone cervical cancer screening over the last five years. The controls were women who had never been screened or screened more than five years before, matched to the cases with residency and age (± five years). The cases were selected from central and provincial hospitals and the controls from the same community and districts where the cases resided. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with cervical cancer screening.

resultsThe mean age was 42.37±9.4 years (range: 25-60), 66.67% were women from Vientiane Capital, and 86.11% were married. The common reasons for not being screened were the absence of clinical signs and symptoms (45.28%) followed by never having heard about cervical cancer (13.33%). In the multivariable analyses, we found that having sexually transmitted infections (AOR = 3.93; 95% CI = 1.92-8.05), receiving recommendations for screening from health workers (AOR = 3.85; 95% CI = 1.90-7.78), a high score for knowledge (AOR = 7.90; 95% CI = 2.43-25.69) and attitude towards cervical cancer prevention and treatment (AOR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.18-7.16), and having a car to travel (AOR = 2.97; 95% CI = 1.44-6.11) had a positive impact on undergoing cervical cancer screening.

conclusionGynecological consultations, increased knowledge and positive attitudes result in women undergoing screening. Therefore, health education and advocacy for cervical cancer prevention should be provided to women.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLaosMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID35390098
PMCPMC8989294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.