Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35390076›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia.

Daniel Griffiths, Luke Sheehan, Dennis Petrie, Caryn van Vreden, Peter Whiteford, Alex Collie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The quality of life impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns for people living with multiple sclerosis (MS): evidence from the Australian MS Longitudinal Study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distress Signals: Age Differences in Psychological Distress before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring quality of life in Australian adults during a pandemic.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel GriffithsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3608-3736
Luke SheehanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Dennis PetrieCentre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-2531
Caryn van VredenSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4151-3470
Peter WhitefordCrawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-6797
Alex CollieSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine health impacts during, and following, an extended community lockdown and COVID-19 outbreak in the Australian state of Victoria, compared with the rest of Australia.

methodsA national cohort of 898 working-age Australians enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study, completing surveys before, during, and after a 112-day community lockdown in Victoria (8 July- 27 October 2020). Outcomes included psychological distress, mental and physical health, work, social interactions and finances. Regression models examined health changes during and following lockdown.

resultsThe Victorian lockdown led to increased psychological distress. Health impacts coincided with greater social isolation and work loss. Following the extended lockdown, mental health, work and social interactions recovered to an extent whereby no significant long-lasting effects were identified in Victoria compared to the rest of Australia.

conclusionThe Victorian community lockdown had adverse health consequences, which reversed upon release from lockdown. Governments should weigh all potential health impacts of lockdown. Services and programs to reduce the negative impacts of lockdown may include increases in mental health care, encouraging safe social interactions and supports to maintain employment relationships.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Victoria

Identifiers

PMID35390076
PMCPMC8989338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.