Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389819›Full record

ReviewBioengineered2022

Genetic modifications associated with sustainability aspects for sustainable developments.

Pooja Sharma, Surendra Pratap Singh, Hafiz M N Iqbal, Roberto Parra-Saldivar, Sunita Varjani, Yen Wah Tong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. PidTools: Algorithm and web tools for crop pedigree identification analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Genetically Engineered Microorganisms and Their Impact on Human Health.International journal of clinical practice · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetic Analysis and Fine Mapping ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pooja SharmaEnvironmental Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Surendra Pratap SinghPlant Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, D.A.V. College, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, Kanpur, India.
Hafiz M N IqbalTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4855-2720
Roberto Parra-SaldivarFEMSA, Tecnológico de MonterreyEscuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias- Centro de Biotecnología-, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-5797
Sunita VarjaniGujarat Pollution Control Board, Gandhinagar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6966-7768
Yen Wah TongEnvironmental Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGTecnológico de Monterrey · MXCentral Pollution Control Board · INChhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable development serves as the foundation for a range of international and national policymaking. Traditional breeding methods have been used to modify plant genomes and production. Genetic engineering is the practice of assisting agricultural systems in adapting to rapidly changing global growth by hastening the breeding of new varieties. On the other hand, the development of genetic engineering has enabled more precise control over the genomic alterations made in recent decades. Genetic changes from one species can now be introduced into a completely unrelated species, increasing agricultural output or making certain elements easier to manufacture. Harvest plants and soil microorganisms are just a few of the more well-known genetically modified creatures. Researchers assess current studies and illustrate the possibility of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) from the perspectives of various stakeholders. GMOs increase yields, reduce costs, and reduce agriculture's terrestrial and ecological footprint. Modern technology benefits innovators, farmers, and consumers alike. Agricultural biotechnology has numerous applications, each with its own set of potential consequences. This will be able to reach its full potential if more people have access to technology and excessive regulation is avoided. This paper covers the regulations for genetically modified crops (GMCs) as well as the economic implications. It also includes sections on biodiversity and environmental impact, as well as GMCs applications. This recounts biotechnological interventions for long-term sustainability in the field of GMCs, as well as the challenges and opportunities in this field of research.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalSustainable DevelopmentAgricultureBiotechnologyGenetic EngineeringHumansPlants, Genetically ModifiedbiodiversitybiotechnologyenvironmentsustainabilityTransgenic crops

Identifiers

PMID35389819
PMCPMC9161841
OpenAlexW4223430525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.