ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022
Amplification of input differences by dynamic heterogeneity in the spiral ganglion.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biohybrid cochlear implants: neural interfaces, regenerative pathways, and translational benchmarks.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Modulation of potassium conductances optimizes fidelity of auditory information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A defining feature of type I primary auditory afferents that compose ∼95% of the spiral ganglion is their intrinsic electrophysiological heterogeneity. This diversity is evident both between and within unitary, rapid, and slow adaptation (UA, RA, and SA) classes indicative of specializations designed to shape sensory receptor input. But to what end? Our initial impulse is to expect the opposite: that auditory afferents fire uniformly to represent acoustic stimuli with accuracy and high fidelity. Yet this is clearly not the case. One explanation for this neural signaling strategy is to coordinate a system in which differences between input stimuli are amplified. If this is correct, then stimulus disparity enhancements within the primary afferents should be transmitted seamlessly into auditory processing pathways that utilize population coding for difference detection. Using sound localization as an example, one would expect to observe separately regulated differences in intensity level compared with timing or spectral cues within a graded tonotopic distribution. This possibility was evaluated by examining the neuromodulatory effects of cAMP on immature neurons with high excitability and slow membrane kinetics. We found that electrophysiological correlates of intensity and timing were indeed independently regulated and tonotopically distributed, depending on intracellular cAMP signaling level. These observations, therefore, are indicative of a system in which differences between signaling elements of individual stimulus attributes are systematically amplified according to auditory processing constraints. Thus, dynamic heterogeneity mediated by cAMP in the spiral ganglion has the potential to enhance the representations of stimulus input disparities transmitted into higher level difference detection circuitry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.