ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2022
The role of domain-general attention and domain-specific processing in working memory in algebraic performance: An experimental approach.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relation Between Attention and Memory.Annual review of psychology · 2024Review
- Relative Contributions ofIntelligenceArticle
- Reasoning More Efficiently with Primary Knowledge Despite Extraneous Cognitive Load.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behaviorArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the role of working memory in symbolic and spatial algebra and related tasks across five experiments. Each experiment combined a processing task (expression evaluation, arithmetic, coordinate plane, geometry, or mental rotation) with verbal and spatial memory loads in a dual-task design. Spatial memory was compromised in the presence of more difficult processing tasks, and verbal memory was only compromised in the presence of algebraic tasks. The latter was related to the demands of retaining quantities associated with variables in verbal memory. We suggest that both verbal and spatial working memory retention engage domain-general attention, but that their maintenance mechanisms differ. Verbal memory has attention-based and rehearsal-based mechanisms, and thus sustaining verbal information over a short period is less attention-demanding than holding spatial information. We suggest that effects of a memory load on processing (e.g., x = 6) depend on whether use of maintenance strategies are possible for the specific memory load while carrying out processing. In all, our results indicate that algebraic tasks use domain-general attention and include verbal processing of algebraic variables (i.e., information conveyed in x, y). We discuss the implications for algebra learning and working memory theories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.