Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389691›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2022

Carbon monoxide monitoring to objectively measure smoking status in cardiac rehabilitation.

Diann E Gaalema, Blair Yant, Sherrie Khadanga, Patrick D Savage, Jason L Rengo, Philip A Ades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Objective measure of smoking status highlights disparities by sex.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diann E GaalemaDepartment of Psychiatry.
Blair YantDepartment of Psychiatry.
Sherrie KhadangaDivision of Cardiology.
Patrick D SavageDivision of Cardiology.
Jason L RengoDivision of Cardiology.
Philip A AdesDivision of Cardiology.

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients: Efficacy of Early Case Management and Financial IncentivesR33HL143305 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI ADES, PHILIP A., GAALEMA, DIANN E · 2019 to 2022
$3.0M
National Institutes of Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL143305NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveParticipation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. However, most programs rely on self-report measures when assessing the critical risk factor of smoking. This study examined smoking status using self-report versus objective measurement using expired carbon monoxide (CO) and compared patient characteristics by CO level.

methodPatients were screened for smoking status when entering CR by self-report and by objectively measured CO. Measures of aerobic fitness, educational attainment, depressive symptoms, and self-reported physical function were also collected. The discrepancy between smoking status based on self-report and objective measurement was examined and patient characteristics by CO measurement were compared.

resultsOf the 853 patients screened, 62 self-reported current smoking and 112 had a CO of ≥ 4 ppm. Using a cut-off of ≥ 4 ppm encompassed almost all self-reported smokers (specificity: 98.5%) and identified 61 patients (not reporting current smoking) needing further screening. Further questioning yielded an additional 21 patients with combusted use (tobacco/cannabis), six nonsmoking patients with environmental CO exposure, and 34 where the reason for elevated CO was unknown. CO ≥ 4 ppm patients were younger (62.2 vs. 67.7,

conclusionsA substantial number of patients who are actively smoking may be misclassified by relying on patient report alone. CO monitoring provides a simple and objective method of systematically screening patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Carbon MonoxideCardiac RehabilitationBreath TestsExhalationHumansSmokingCarbon Monoxide

Identifiers

PMID35389691
PMCPMC9481659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.