Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389636›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2022

Microscopic Simulations of Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors.

Guillaume Jeanmairet, Benjamin Rotenberg, Mathieu Salanne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electrotunable Kapitza Resistance at Electrode-Water Interfaces: The Importance of Electrode Metallicity.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Uncertainty Quantification forChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Convection can enhance the capacitive charging of porous electrodes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Capacitance Measurements for Evaluating Electrochemical Double-Layer Models and Potentials of Zero Charge: A Reassessment.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillaume JeanmairetSorbonne Université, CNRS, Physico-chimie des Électrolytes et Nanosystèmes Interfaciaux, PHENIX, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3560-9273
Benjamin RotenbergSorbonne Université, CNRS, Physico-chimie des Electrolytes et Nanosystèmes Interfaciaux, PHENIX, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5198-4650
Mathieu SalanneRéseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l'Energie (RS2E), FR CNRS 3459, 80039 Amiens, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1753-491X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) are devices allowing the storage or production of electricity. They function through the adsorption of ions from an electrolyte on high-surface-area electrodes and are characterized by short charging/discharging times and long cycle-life compared to batteries. Microscopic simulations are now widely used to characterize the structural, dynamical, and adsorption properties of these devices, complementing electrochemical experiments and

Identifiers

PMID35389636
PMCPMC9227719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.