ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2022
Risk of Ocular Adverse Events Associated With Use of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors in Men in the US.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor use and incident diabetic retinopathy in men with erectile dysfunction and type 2 diabetes: a propensity-matched cohort study.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Apparent Non-Response to Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors in Erectile Dysfunction: A Narrative Review of Structured Reassessment and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Safety profile and signal detection of tadalafil: a real-world analysis based on the Food and Drug adverse event reporting system.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Sildenafil use and risk of serous retinal detachment in men with erectile dysfunction in US.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Drug-related retinal detachment pharmacovigilance signals in the real world: evidence from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Drug-induced retinal vein occlusion: a disproportionality analysis from the FDA adverse event reporting system (2004-2023).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- [Internistic clarification of retinal vascular occlusions].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors is not associated with ocular adverse events.The journal of sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Azithromycin and Sildenafil May Have Protective Effects on Retinal Ganglion Cells via Different Pathways: Study in a Rodent Microbead Model.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 2022 - Pros and Cons in General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023Article
- Retinal Toxicity Induced by Chemical Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: A number of case reports and small epidemiologic studies have quantified the risk of ocular adverse events associated with the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is). However, results have been conflicting, and epidemiologic data on the risk of serous retinal detachment (SRD) and retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) are not available. Objective: To quantify the risk of SRD, RVO, and ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) associated with the use of PDE5Is. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study with a nested case-control analysis was performed using data obtained from the PharMetrics Plus database (IQVIA) from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2020. Cohort members were followed up until the first diagnosis of SRD, RVO, or ION or termination of insurance coverage. For each case, 4 controls were matched by age and time of study entry using density-based sampling. Risk for regular users of PDE5Is was compared with that for nonusers, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Cases with diagnoses of SRD, RVO, and ION in the year before the cohort were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: First diagnosis of SRD, RVO, or ION identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using conditional logistic regression, controlling for hypertension, coronary artery disease, smoking, and diabetes (for all 3 outcomes) as well as sleep apnea for the ION outcome. Results: The cohort consisted of 213 033 men receiving PDE5Is, including sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and avanafil. The case-control analysis included a total of 1146 cases of SRD (278), RVO (628), and ION (240) and 4584 controls, and the mean (SD) age in both groups was 64.6 (13.3) years. Patients with SRD, RVO, and ION were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and sleep apnea. The adjusted IRR for the composite end points of any of the 3 outcomes was 1.85 (95% CI, 1.41-2.42; incidence, 15.5 cases per 10 000 person-years). The adjusted IRR for SRD, RVO, and ION as individual outcomes was 2.58 (95% CI, 1.55-4.30; incidence, 3.8 cases per 10 000 person-years), 1.44 (95% CI, 0.98-2.12; incidence, 8.5 cases per 10 000 person-years), and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.14-3.58; incidence, 3.2 cases per 10 000 person-years), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that regular users of PDE5Is might have an increased risk for SRD, RVO, and ION. Regular users of PDE5Is need to be cognizant of ocular adverse events associated with these drugs and alert their physicians if they experience any visual deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.