Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389363›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Digital Visual Communication for Public Health: Design Proposal for a Vaccinated Emoji.

Tamara Sonia Boender, Noah Louis-Ferdinand, Gideon Duschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tamara Sonia BoenderSurveillance Unit, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4418-3713
Noah Louis-FerdinandVoices for Vaccines, Decatur, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5508-6049
Gideon DuschekOmmado, Amsterdam Area, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0785-3332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 21st century, the internet and particularly social media have become essential platforms for the spread of health information (including misinformation and disinformation). One of the distinguishing features of communication on these platforms is the widespread use of emojis. Though seemingly trivial emojis are now used by many if not most public health figures and organizations alongside important health updates. Much of that information has had to do with vaccination. Vaccines are a critical public health tool but one surrounded by falsehoods, phobias, and misinformation fueling vaccine hesitancy. Part of that has to do with their lack of positive representation on social media (eg, the syringe emoji is a plain needle, which for many people is an uncomfortable image). We thus argue that vaccination deserves an entirely new emoji to communicate vaccine confidence and discuss a design proposal for a vaccinated emoji that has gained traction in the global public health community.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaVaccinesCommunicationHumansPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2Vaccinesdesigndigital communicationemojiinfodemic managementscience communicationvaccinationvaccine confidence

Identifiers

PMID35389363
PMCPMC8993141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.