ArticleJMIR medical education2022
Design and First Impressions of a Small Private Online Course in Clinical Workplace Learning: Questionnaire and Interview Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing anesthesia monitoring training: a SPOC and Gagné's model hybrid personalized by artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Designing user-centered evaluations: Leveraging beta-testing results to develop process evaluation interview questions for the AMPLIFY program.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Internal medicine clerks' motivation in an online course: a mixed-methods study.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Article
- Negative learning behavior in small private online courses (SPOCs): findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Clinical nursing mentors' motivation, attitude, and practice for mentoring and factors associated with them.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Blended teaching mode based on small private online course and case-based learning in analgesia and sedation education in China: a comparison with an offline mode.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical workplace learning takes place in a dynamic and complex learning environment that is designated as a site for patient care and education. Challenges in clinical training can be overcome by implementing blended learning, as it offers flexible learning programs suitable for student-centered learning, web-based collaboration, and peer learning.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the Small Private Online Course (SPOC) by interns' first impressions and satisfaction measures (N=20) on using the SPOC. This study describes the design process of a SPOC from a theoretical and practical perspective and how it has been integrated into a clinical internship in internal medicine.
methodsThe design of the SPOC was based on general theoretical principles that learning should be constructive, contextual, collaborative, and self-regulated, and the self-determination theory to stimulate intrinsic motivation. Interns' impressions and level of satisfaction were evaluated with a web-based questionnaire and group interview.
resultsInterns thought the web-based learning environment to be a useful and accessible alternative to improve knowledge and skills. Peer learning and web-based collaboration through peer interaction was perceived as less effective, as student feedback was felt inferior to teacher feedback. The interns would prefer more flexibility within the course, which could improve self-regulated learning and autonomy.
conclusionsThe evaluation shows that the SPOC is a useful and accessible addition to the clinical learning environment, providing an alternative opportunity to improve knowledge and skills. Further research is needed to improve web-based collaboration and interaction in our course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.