Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389346›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Phoenix atherectomy for patients with peripheral artery disease.

Sorin Giusca, Saskia Hagstotz, Michael Lichtenberg, Ulrike Heinrich, Christoph Eisenbach, Martin Andrassy, Grigorios Korosoglou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Atherectomy Followed by Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Surgery for Symptomatic Deep Femoral Artery Arteriosclerotic Disease.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. [Peripheral artery disease II: femoropopliteal lesions].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-term outcomes of peripheral atherectomy for femoropopliteal endovascular interventions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sorin GiuscaGRN Hospital Weinheim, Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Weinheim, Germany.
Saskia HagstotzGRN Hospital Weinheim, Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Weinheim, Germany.
Michael LichtenbergVascular Center Klinikum Arnsberg, Arnsberg, Germany.
Ulrike HeinrichPractice for Vascular Medicine and Gastroenterology, Weinheim, Germany.
Christoph EisenbachGRN Hospital Weinheim, Diabetology and Gastroenterology, Weinheim, Germany.
Martin AndrassyFuerst-Stirum Hospital, Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Bruchsal, Germany.
Grigorios KorosoglouGRN Hospital Weinheim, Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Weinheim, Germany.
Klinikum Arnsberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovascular atherectomy enables minimally invasive plaque removal in peripheral artery disease (PAD).

aimsWe aimed to evaluate the safety and the long-term effectiveness of the Phoenix atherectomy for the treatment of complex and calcified lesions in PAD patients.

methodsConsecutive all-comer patients with PAD underwent the Phoenix atherectomy. Device safety in terms of perforation and distal embolisation were evaluated. Lesion calcifications were categorised by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) and lesion complexity was assessed by the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) was assessed.

resultsA total of 558 lesions were treated in 402 consecutive patients. Clinical follow-up was available at 15.7±10.2 months for 365 (91%) patients. Of 402 patients, 135 (33.6%) had claudication, 37 (9.2%) had ischaemic rest pain and 230 (57%) exhibited ischaemic ulcerations. Lesions were mostly identified in the femoropopliteal segments (55%), followed by below-the-knee (BTK) segments (32%). Complex TASC C/D lesions and moderate to severe calcifications (PACSS score ≥2) were present in 331 (82%) and 323 (80%) patients, respectively. The mean lesion length was 20.6±14.3 cm. Five (1%) perforations and 10 (2%) asymptomatic embolisations occurred. Bail-out stenting was performed in 4%, 16% and 3% of patients with common femoral artery, femoropopliteal and BTK lesions, respectively. During follow-up, 5 (3.9%) patients with claudication and 52 (21.9%) patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) died (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7; p<0.001). Freedom from TLR was 87.5% (112 of 128) in patients with claudication and 82.3% (195 of 237) in patients with CLTI, respectively (HR 1.8; p=0.03).

conclusionsThe Phoenix atherectomy can be safely performed in patients with complex lesions with a relatively low rate of bail-out stenting and clinically acceptable TLR rates. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER: DRKS00016708.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonPeripheral Arterial DiseaseAtherectomyFemoral ArteryHumansIntermittent ClaudicationPopliteal ArteryRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVascular Patency

Identifiers

PMID35389346
PMCPMC10331978
OpenAlexW4226256275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.