Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389345›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Prevalence and outcomes of stent thrombosis with in-stent calcified nodules: substudy from the REAL-ST registry.

Yu Takahashi, Hiromasa Otake, Shoichi Kuramitsu, Masanobu Ohya, Kazunori Horie, Hiroyoshi Kawamoto, Futoshi Yamanaka, Masahiro Natsuaki, Hiroki Shiomi, Gaku Nakazawa and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yu TakahashiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Hiromasa OtakeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Shoichi KuramitsuDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Masanobu OhyaDepartment of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Kazunori HorieDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroyoshi KawamotoDepartment of Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Futoshi YamanakaDivision of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masahiro NatsuakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Hiroki ShiomiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Gaku NakazawaDepartment of Cardiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kenji AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kazushige KadotaDepartment of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Shigeru SaitoDivision of Cardiology and Catheterization Laboratories, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takeshi KimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kobe University · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPKindai University · JPNew Tokyo Hospital · JPSaga University · JPSendai Kousei Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between in-stent calcified nodules (IS-CN) and second-generation drug-eluting stent (G2-DES) stent thrombosis (ST) remains uncertain.

aimsWe aimed to evaluate the prevalence, clinical demographic and long-term clinical outcomes after G2-DES ST with IS-CN.

methodsThe prespecified substudy of the REAL-ST registry (a retrospective, multicentre registry of patients with definite ST after first- and G2-DES implantation) enrolled patients who experienced definite G2-DES ST and who underwent pre-intervention intravascular ultrasound imaging at index ST events.

resultsIS-CN was observed in 15 out of 118 (13%) definite G2-DES ST cases. The multiple logistic regression model demonstrated that haemodialysis (odds ratio [OR] 12.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-94.54; p=0.02), proximal or mid-right coronary artery lesions (OR 12.79, 95% CI: 1.78-92.13; p=0.01) and severe calcification (OR 13.01, 95% CI: 1.18-142.94; p=0.04) were independently associated with ST with IS-CN. The cumulative 5-year incidence of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) after ST was significantly higher in the IS-CN group than in the non-IS-CN group (p=0.02). Independent predictors of TLR after the index ST events were female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 3.05, 95% CI: 1.20-7.74; p=0.02), diabetes mellitus (HR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.26-8.41; p=0.01) and IS-CN (HR 3.07, 95% CI: 1.16-8.14; p=0.02).

conclusionsIS-CN may be one of the underlying mechanisms of G2-DES ST. Notably, IS-CN was associated with a higher TLR rate after the index ST events, suggesting the need for careful clinical follow-up of ST patients with IS-CN.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionThrombosisFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRegistriesRetrospective StudiesStents

Identifiers

PMID35389345
PMCPMC10241266
OpenAlexW4225533111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.