Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389336›Full record

ReviewParasite (Paris, France)2022

Confounding factors affecting faecal egg count reduction as a measure of anthelmintic efficacy.

Eric R Morgan, Carlos Lanusse, Laura Rinaldi, Johannes Charlier, Jozef Vercruysse

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasite (Paris, France), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sustainable worm control in ruminants in Europe: current perspectives.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  8. Periodicity ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multiple anthelmintic drug resistant Ancylostoma caninum in foxhounds.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effectiveness of Anthelmintic Treatments in Small Ruminants in Germany.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Eric R MorganSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 19, Chlorine Gardens, BT9 5DL Belfast, United Kingdom.
Carlos LanusseLaboratorio de Farmacología, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN) (UNCPBA-CICPBA-CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, UNCPBA, 7000 Tandil, Argentina.
Laura RinaldiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino, 1, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Johannes CharlierKreavet, Hendrik Mertensstraat 17, 9150 Kruibeke, Belgium.
Jozef VercruysseFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Gent, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tandil · ARGhent University · BEQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBR0102501European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA16230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing anthelmintic resistance (AR) in livestock has stimulated growing efforts to monitor anthelmintic effectiveness (AE) on livestock farms. On-farm assessment of AE relies on measuring the reduction in faecal egg count (FEC) following treatment; and if conducted rigorously, qualifies as a formal FEC reduction test (FECRT) for AR. Substantial research effort has been devoted to designing robust protocols for the FECRT and its statistical interpretation; however, a wide range of factors other than AR can affect FEC reduction on farms. These are not always possible to control, and can affect the outcome and repeatability of AE measurements and confound the on-farm classification of AR using FECRT. This review considers confounders of FEC reduction, focusing on gastrointestinal nematodes of ruminants, including host and parasite physiology and demography; pharmacokinetic variation between drugs, parasites and hosts; and technical performance. Drug formulation and delivery, host condition and diet, and seasonal variation in parasite species composition, can all affect AE and hence observed FEC reduction. Causes of variation in FEC reduction should be attenuated, but this is not always possible. Regular monitoring of AE can indicate a need to improve anthelmintic administration practices, and detect AR early in its progression. Careful interpretation of FEC reduction, however, taking into account possible confounders, is essential before attributing reduced FEC reduction to AR. Understanding of confounders of FEC reduction will complement advances in FECRT design and interpretation to provide measures of anthelmintic efficacy that are both rigorous and accessible.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsNematodaAnimalsDrug ResistanceFecesParasite Egg CountAnthelminticsAnthelmintic resistanceDrug pharmacology related therapeutic failuresEffectivenessEpidemiologyFaecal egg count reduction testHelminthsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35389336
PMCPMC8988865
OpenAlexW4225899881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.