ReviewExpert review of anticancer therapy2022
Treatment of small (T1mic, T1a, and T1b) node-negative HER2+ breast cancer - a review of current evidence for and against the use of anti-HER2 treatment regimens.
Review in Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in small-tumor breast cancer with different immune subtypes: a SEER-based study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Article
- The survival benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy in the management of small (T1mic, T1a, T1b, T1c), node negative HER2+ breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Alkaloids as Additional Weapons in the Fight against Breast Cancer: A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- An update on the pathological classification of breast cancer.Histopathology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSince the advent of anti-HER2 therapies, evidence surrounding adjuvant treatment of small (T1mic, T1a, and T1b), node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC) has remained limited. Practices vary widely between institutions with little known regarding the added benefit of systemic therapy, including cytotoxic chemotherapy and HER2-directed treatments. Our group has set out to perform an extensive review of available literature on this topic. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we examined HER2 biology, anti-HER therapies, outcome definitions, and available prospective and retrospective data surrounding the use of adjuvant therapy in those with small, node-negative, HER2+ BC. For outcomes, we primarily explored breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), and overall survival (OS). We also investigated the incidence of adverse events with a particular focus on symptomatic and asymptomatic declines in ejection fraction. EXPERT OPINION: Retrospective data will likely be the main driver for future treatment decisions. Given what we know, high-risk T1b and T1c subgroups derive measurable added benefit from HER2-guided combination therapies but it's not clear whether these benefits outweigh known risks associated with this combination therapy. For tumors ≤0.5 cm (T1mic and T1a), treatment remains highly controversial with limited evidence available through retrospective analysis that suggest over-treatment may be occurring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.