Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389144›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2022

Consensus Obtained for the Nephrotoxic Potential of 167 Drugs in Adult Critically Ill Patients Using a Modified Delphi Method.

Matthew P Gray, Erin F Barreto, Diana J Schreier, John A Kellum, Kangho Suh, Kianoush B Kashani, Andrew D Rule, Sandra L Kane-Gill

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew P GraySchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-6215
Erin F BarretoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-1487
Diana J SchreierDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-5505
John A KellumDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1995-2653
Kangho SuhSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-9398
Kianoush B KashaniDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-3683
Andrew D RuleDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0338-7784
Sandra L Kane-GillSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. Kane-Gill@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7523-4846
University of Pittsburgh · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe approach to evaluating nephrotoxins in studies of drug-associated acute kidney injury varies. Some studies use a list of under ten drugs for evaluation whereas others include over 100 drugs. Drugs are typically assigned a binary classification, nephrotoxic or not nephrotoxic. This oversimplifies the nephrotoxic potential of the drugs under investigation.

objectiveThis study aimed to assign a nephrotoxin potential for 167 drugs used in the adult critical care setting.

methodsA three-round, international, interdisciplinary, web-based modified-Delphi study was used to evaluate nephrotoxins used in adult critically ill patients. Twenty-four international experienced clinicians were identified through the Acute Disease Quality Initiative group and professional affiliations. Included individuals represented the fields of intensive care, nephrology, and pharmacy. One hundred and fifty-nine medications were identified from the literature, with eight additional medications added after the first round, for a total of 167 medications. The primary outcome was consensus achieved for nephrotoxicity ratings. Scores were evaluated each round to determine if a consensus was met.

resultsOur nephrotoxin potential index rating indicated that 20 drugs were nephrotoxicity probable or probable/definite per consensus. Nephrotoxic potential was assessed based on the standard use of medications in intensive care and the following consensus scores: 0 = no nephrotoxic potential, 1 = possible nephrotoxic potential, 2 = probable nephrotoxic potential, 3 = definite nephrotoxic potential.

conclusionsThe nephrotoxin potential index rating allows for prioritization of targeted drugs with greater nephrotoxic potential for institutional nephrotoxin stewardship programs. Furthermore, the nephrotoxin potential index rating provides homogeneity for research and guidance on detailed assessments by severity for each drug.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsCritical IllnessDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID35389144
PMCPMC8988110
OpenAlexW4223438510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.