Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389133›Full record

ReviewNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2022

Using real-world data to monitor and improve quality of care in coronary artery disease: results from the Netherlands Heart Registration.

Marijke J C Timmermans, Saskia Houterman, Edgar D Daeter, Peter W Danse, Wilson W Li, Erik Lipsic, Maaike M Roefs, Dennis van Veghel, PCI Registration Committee of the Netherlands Heart Registration and the Cardiothoracic Surgery Registration Committee of the Netherlands Heart Registration

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improved patient value after implementing same day discharge for patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Predictors of quality of life after cardiac procedures: a mixed-methods study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Cardiology in numbers: coronary artery disease in the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Medication adherence to lipid-lowering agents after percutaneous coronary intervention: nationwide real-world data in the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Repeat ablation strategies in atrial fibrillation patients with durably isolated pulmonary veins: insights from the Netherlands Heart Registration.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Mortality rates and causes of death after cardiac interventions: real-world short- and long-term insights from the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  17. Nationwide Analysis of PCI After TAVR From the Netherlands Heart Registration.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Incidence and trends of patient MACE outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): analysis by age and sex.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marijke J C TimmermansNetherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, The Netherlands. marijke.timmermans@nederlandsehartregistratie.nl.
Saskia HoutermanNetherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Edgar D DaeterDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Peter W DanseDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Wilson W LiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Erik LipsicDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maaike M RoefsNetherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dennis van VeghelNetherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PCI Registration Committee of the Netherlands Heart Registration and the Cardiothoracic Surgery Registration Committee of the Netherlands Heart Registration
Dutch Heart Registry · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, quality registries for cardiovascular diseases enable the use of real-world data to monitor and improve the quality of cardiac care. In the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR), cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons register baseline, procedural and outcome data across all invasive cardiac interventional, electrophysiological and surgical procedures. This paper provides insight into the governance and processes as organised by the NHR in collaboration with the hospitals. To clarify the processes, examples are given from the percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting registries. Physicians who are mandated by their hospital to instruct the NHR to process their data are united in registration committees. The committees determine standard sets of variables and periodically discuss the completeness and quality of data and patient-relevant outcomes. In the case of significant variation in outcomes, processes of healthcare delivery are discussed and good practices are shared in a non-competitive and safe setting. To create new insights for further improvement in patient-relevant outcomes, quality projects are initiated on, for example, multivessel disease treatment, cardiogenic shock and diagnostic intracoronary procedures. Moreover, possibilities are explored to expand the quality registries through additional relevant indicators, such as resource use before and after the procedure, by enriching NHR data with other existing data resources.

Indexed as

Coronary artery bypass graftingCoronary artery diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionQuality registryValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID35389133
PMCPMC8988537
OpenAlexW4223563748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.