ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022
Measuring green development level at a regional scale: framework, model, and application.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a health literacy scale for parasitic diseases.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Coupling Coordination Measurement and Evaluation of Urban Digitalization and Green Development in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Green Development Performance Evaluation Based on Dual Perspectives of Level and Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we propose and construct a novel model that measures regional green development level based on the "three-circle" conceptual framework for green development. Using Jiangsu Province in eastern China as a case study, the spatial-temporal characteristics and dynamics of the green development level from 2000 to 2020 were evaluated using a multi-source dataset at the grid-cell level. Our results show that (1) the analytical hierarchy process-based model proposed herein has higher reliability in terms of the development level measurement than principal component analysis and the entropy weight method. In addition, the average score of green development in the study area was approximately 0.53. Spatially, the green development level in the eastern coastal areas of the study area was found to be generally higher than in other regions, while that in southwestern regions is relatively low. In terms of sub-regions, the green development level scores of the study area have been ranked as follows: middle Jiangsu > southern Jiangsu > northern Jiangsu. (2) It was observed that the gravity center of the green development level can be divided into three stages during the study, with a whole had shifted to the north. (3) For most cities in Jiangsu, the green development level initially increased at first, then declined, and then increased again. (4) In the future, the green development level of Jiangsu Province should pay more attention to promoting regional coordinated development and relationships between society and the environment under rapid economic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35389100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.