ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022
Epitope mapping of antibodies in C-reactive protein assay kits by hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry explains differential results across kits.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in carcinoembryonic antigen detection: a review of clinical applications and standardization.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Direct Mapping of Polyclonal Epitopes in Serum by HDX-MS.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange and other Mass Spectrometry-based Approaches for Epitope Mapping.Frontiers in analytical science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
C-Reactive protein (CRP) is an important marker for in vitro diagnosis (IVD) of inflammation. However, CRP immunoturbidimetric kits from different manufacturers exhibit inconsistency in evaluation, making clinical diagnosis challenging. The use of immunological methods in diagnosis means that the differences in epitopes across kits may directly lead to inconsistent results. Therefore, to provide consistent results, it is essential to perform epitope mapping of different kits. The composition of antibodies in a single kit is typically complex, with a combination of polyclonal antibodies or monoclonal antibodies. Here, we show an epitope screening strategy for complex antibodies in a kit based on hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). We applied this workflow to successfully map the epitopes for three kits from three different manufacturers and compared their quantitative results. We obtained different quantitative results using kits from different manufacturers upon epitope mapping, confirming the correlation between the quantitative results and the epitopes. Thus, we have established a workflow based on HDX-MS to screen epitopes in IVD kits. This work helps determine the quantitative accuracy of a kit based on structural information, can guide the design and production of IVD reagents, and further improves the accuracy of IVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.