Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35389073›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2022

The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the pectus carinatum body image quality of life questionnaire.

Nuray Alaca, Dilek Çağrı Aslan, İhsan Alaca, Mustafa Yüksel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06009601 (Are Pectus Deformities a Projection of Spinal Pathologies?The Relationship Between Pectus Deformities and Spinal Pathologies), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06009601 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Are Pectus Deformities a Projection of Spinal Pathologies?The Relationship Between Pectus Deformities and Spinal Pathologies

TypeobservationalSponsorGaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsPectus Deformity of Chest, Spinal DeformityArmsPectus Study Form, Adams Test, Scoliosis Graphy, Pulmonary function test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nuray AlacaDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Kerem Aydınlar Kampusu, Icerenkoy Mah. Kayısdagı Cad. No: 32, Atasehir, 34752, Istanbul, Turkey. nuray.alaca@acibadem.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3034-9388
Dilek Çağrı AslanDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Kerem Aydınlar Kampusu, Icerenkoy Mah. Kayısdagı Cad. No: 32, Atasehir, 34752, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-8690
İhsan AlacaDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Kerem Aydınlar Kampusu, Icerenkoy Mah. Kayısdagı Cad. No: 32, Atasehir, 34752, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-923X
Mustafa YükselChest Wall Deformities and Pectus Association, Zuhtupasa Mah., Kadıkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-4194
Kent Hastanesi · TRAcıbadem University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Pectus Carinatum Body Image Quality of Life Questionnaire (PeCBI-QOL), which was originally created in American English in patients with pectus carinatum (PC).

methodsThe study included 52 volunteer patients with PC, aged 10-18 years. Cronbach α was used to assess internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the test-retest reliability. Construct validity was analyzed with the Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire (PEEQ).

resultsThe reliability of the Turkish version of the PeCBI-QOL was found to have acceptable to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.701-950). Test-retest reliability calculated for investigating the reliability of the questionnaire over time was found to be excellent (ICC = 0.817-0.983). Construct validity of the PeCBI-QOL (child and parent form) was found to be correlated with all subscales in the PEEQ questionnaire (r = - 0.425 to 897, p < 0.001) except the treatment motivation subscale (r = 0.033-0.111, p = 0.439-0.816).

conclusionWe determined that the Turkish version of the PeCBI-QOL questionnaire was valid and reliable for the assessment of body image and quality of life in Turkish patients with PC. PeCBI-QOL questionnaire, a self-assessment one, will assist Turkish clinicians who wish to assess body image and quality of life of patients with PC.

Indexed as

Funnel ChestPectus CarinatumBody ImageChildHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesPectus carinatumPectus Carinatum Body Image Quality of Life QuestionnaireReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID35389073
OpenAlexW4225248902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.