ArticleESC heart failure2022
Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early-phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconsidering the Prognostic Role of the HALP Score in Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Integrating Findings Into Practice: Assessing External Validity of Congestive Heart Failure Trials.Cardiology research · 2026Article
- Association between treatment-induced changes in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and clinical outcomes in chronic heart failure: a trial-level meta-regression analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Beyond metabolism and blood flow: toward an inflammation-metabolism axis paradigm for herbal medicine in obesity-related coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Insights into the interconnection of sarcopenia in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Drug Discovery and Development for Heart Failure Using Multi-Omics Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Human epididymis protein 4 is a useful predictor of post-operative prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Article
- Precision Cardiology: Phenotype-targeted Therapies for HFmrEF and HFpEF.International journal of heart failure · 2024Review
- N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations, testing and associations with worsening heart failure events.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early-phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsNo biomarker has achieved widespread acceptance as a surrogate endpoint for early-phase heart failure (HF) trials. We assessed whether changes over time in a panel of plasma biomarkers were associated with subsequent morbidity/mortality in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND
resultsIn 1040 patients with HFrEF from the BIOSTAT-CHF cohort, we investigated the associations between changes in the plasma concentrations of 30 biomarkers, before (baseline) and after (9 months) attempted optimization of guideline-recommended therapy, on top of the BIOSTAT risk score and the subsequent risk of HF hospitalization/all-cause mortality using Cox regression models. C-statistics were calculated to assess discriminatory power of biomarker changes/month-nine assessment. Changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and WAP four-disulphide core domain protein HE4 (WAP-4C) were the only independent predictors of the outcome after adjusting for their baseline plasma concentration, 28 other biomarkers (both baseline and changes), and BIOSTAT risk score at baseline. When adjusting for month-nine rather than baseline biomarkers concentrations, only changes in NT-proBNP were independently associated with the outcome. The C-statistic of the model including the BIOSTAT risk score and NT-proBNP increased by 4% when changes were considered on top of baseline concentrations and by 1% when changes in NT-proBNP were considered on top of its month-nine concentrations and the BIOSTAT risk score.
conclusionsAmong 30 relevant biomarkers, a change over time was significantly and independently associated with HF hospitalization/all-cause death only for NT-proBNP. Changes over time were modestly more prognostic than baseline or end-values alone. Changes in biomarkers should be further explored as potential surrogate endpoints in early phase HF trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.