Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35388486›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Automated estimation of total lung volume using chest radiographs and deep learning.

Ecem Sogancioglu, Keelin Murphy, Ernst Th Scholten, Luuk H Boulogne, Mathias Prokop, Bram van Ginneken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deep learning-based lung volume estimation with dynamic chest radiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MULTI-VIEW CNN FOR TOTAL LUNG VOLUME INFERENCE ON CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ecem SoganciogluDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Keelin MurphyDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ernst Th ScholtenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Luuk H BoulogneDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mathias ProkopDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bram van GinnekenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

DLMedIA: Deep Learning for Medical Image AnalysisMinistry of Economic Affairs (Perspectief programme) P15-26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal lung volume is an important quantitative biomarker and is used for the assessment of restrictive lung diseases. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate the performance of several deep-learning approaches for automated measurement of total lung volume from chest radiographs.

methodsAbout 7621 posteroanterior and lateral view chest radiographs (CXR) were collected from patients with chest CT available. Similarly, 928 CXR studies were chosen from patients with pulmonary function test (PFT) results. The reference total lung volume was calculated from lung segmentation on CT or PFT data, respectively. This dataset was used to train deep-learning architectures to predict total lung volume from chest radiographs. The experiments were constructed in a stepwise fashion with increasing complexity to demonstrate the effect of training with CT-derived labels only and the sources of error. The optimal models were tested on 291 CXR studies with reference lung volume obtained from PFT. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and Pearson correlation coefficient (Pearson's r) were computed.

resultsThe optimal deep-learning regression model showed an MAE of 408 ml and an MAPE of 8.1% using both frontal and lateral chest radiographs as input. The predictions were highly correlated with the reference standard (Pearson's r = 0.92). CT-derived labels were useful for pretraining but the optimal performance was obtained by fine-tuning the network with PFT-derived labels.

conclusionWe demonstrate, for the first time, that state-of-the-art deep-learning solutions can accurately measure total lung volume from plain chest radiographs. The proposed model is made publicly available and can be used to obtain total lung volume from routinely acquired chest radiographs at no additional cost. This deep-learning system can be a useful tool to identify trends over time in patients referred regularly for chest X-ray.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiography, ThoracicHumansLungLung Volume MeasurementsRetrospective StudiesThoraxartificial intelligencechest radiographchest x-raydeep learningtotal lung volume

Identifiers

PMID35388486
PMCPMC9545721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.