Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35388472›Full record

SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

Multivitamin use and risk of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cecilie Holm Christiansen, Stinne Høgh, Line Rode, Jeppe Bennekou Schroll, Hanne Kristine Hegaard, Hanne Trap Wolf

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dietary supplements and prevention of preeclampsia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Review
  9. Reply: Multivitamin use may lower risk of preeclampsia: A meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  10. Multivitamin use may lower risk of preeclampsia: A meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilie Holm ChristiansenThe Interdisciplinary Research Unit of Women's, Children's and Families' Health, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-6554
Stinne HøghThe Interdisciplinary Research Unit of Women's, Children's and Families' Health, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8712-1088
Line RodeDepartment of Clinical biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jeppe Bennekou SchrollDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-0562
Hanne Kristine HegaardDepartment of Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Center, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne Trap WolfDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4598-9938
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKGlostrup Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreeclampsia is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. It is unclear whether multivitamin use reduces the risk of preeclampsia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between multivitamin use and the risk of preeclampsia. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from database inception to July 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control and cohort studies assessing the association between multivitamin use and risk of preeclampsia were eligible. Studies of treatment with a single micronutrient were excluded. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random-effects models. RoB2, the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and GRADE were used to assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42021214153).

resultsSix studies were included (33 356 women). Only two RCTs were found, both showing a significantly decreased risk of preeclampsia in multivitamin users. These studies were not compatible for meta-analysis due to clinical heterogeneity. A meta-analysis of observational studies using a random-effects model showed an unchanged risk of preeclampsia following multivitamin use (relative risk 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.03). The quality of evidence according to GRADE was very low.

conclusionsVery weak evidence suggests that multivitamin use might reduce the risk of preeclampsia; however, more research is needed. Large RCTs should be prioritized. The results of this review do not allow any final conclusions to be drawn regarding a preventive effect of multivitamin use in relation to preeclampsia.

Indexed as

Pre-EclampsiaCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMicronutrientsPregnancyMicronutrientseclampsiaHELLPmicronutrientsmultivitaminpreeclampsiapregnancypregnant women

Identifiers

PMID35388472
PMCPMC9812096
OpenAlexW4226052165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.