Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35388456›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

HDR prostate brachytherapy plan robustness and its effect on in-vivo source tracking error thresholds: A multi-institutional study.

Joel Poder, Dylan Koprivec, Yashiv Dookie, Andrew Howie, Dean Cutajar, Antonio L Damato, Nicolas Côté, Marco Petasecca, Joseph Bucci, Anatoly Rosenfeld

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joel PoderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Dylan KoprivecCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Yashiv DookieCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew HowieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Dean CutajarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Antonio L DamatoDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, New York, USA.
Nicolas CôtéDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, New York, USA.
Marco PetaseccaCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Joseph BucciDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Anatoly RosenfeldCentre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the effect of departmental planning techniques on appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds for high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy (BT) treatments, and to determine if a single in-vivo source tracking error threshold would be appropriate for the same patient anatomy.

methodsThe prostate, rectum, and urethra were contoured on a single patient transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) dataset. Anonymized DICOM files were disseminated to 16 departments who created an HDR prostate BT treatment plan on the dataset with a prescription dose of 15 Gy in a single fraction. Departments were asked to follow their own local treatment planning guidelines. Source positioning errors were then simulated in the 16 treatment plans and the effect on dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices calculated. Change in DVH indices were used to determine appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds. Plans were considered to require intervention if the following DVH conditions occurred: prostate V100% < 90%, urethra D0.1cc > 118%, and rectumtt Dmax > 80%.

resultsThere was wide variation in appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds among the 16 participating departments, ranging from 1 to 6 mm. Appropriate in-vivo source tracking error thresholds were also found to depend on the direction of the source positioning error and the endpoint. A robustness parameter was derived, and found to correlate with the sensitivity of plans to source positioning errors.

conclusionsA single HDR prostate BT in-vivo source tracking error threshold cannot be applied across multiple departments, even for the same patient anatomy. The burden on in-vivo source tracking devices may be eased through improving HDR prostate BT plan robustness during the plan optimisation phase.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleProstateRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedbrachytherapyHDRin-vivoprostaterobustnesssource tracking

Identifiers

PMID35388456
PMCPMC9322430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.