Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35388453›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023

Science-Based Approach to Harmonize Contraception Recommendations in Clinical Trials and Pharmaceutical Labels.

Christopher J Bowman, Nathalie Becourt-Lhote, Virginie Boulifard, Rüdiger Cordts, Solange Corriol-Rohou, Brian Enright, Linda Erkman, Jayne Harris, Andreas Hartmann, Jan Hilpert and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07301320 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Prospective, Investigator-Initiated Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Epetraborole in Patients With Mycobacterium Abscessus Lung Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07301320 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Prospective, Investigator-Initiated Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Epetraborole in Patients With Mycobacterium Abscessus Lung Disease: REBOUND Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKevin WinthropRan2026 to 2028Enrolled84ConditionsMycobacterium Abscessus InfectionArmsEpetraborole, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Christopher J BowmanWorldwide Research, Development, and Medical, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2425-2603
Nathalie Becourt-LhoteNonclinical Safety, Translational Medicine, Servier, Gidy, France.
Virginie BoulifardIpsen Pharma, Les Ulis, France.
Rüdiger CordtsBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Solange Corriol-RohouGlobal Regulatory Policy, R&D, AstraZeneca, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5227-2724
Brian EnrightPreclinical Safety, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Linda ErkmanPreclinical Safety, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland.
Jayne HarrisClinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Andreas HartmannPreclinical Safety, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland.
Jan HilpertTranslational Medicine, Pharma Research and Early Development, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Sophie KervynUCB Pharma, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Britta MattsonMerck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.
LaRonda MorfordLilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mireille MullerRegulatory Policy, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland.
Marcy PowellGlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Zhanna SobolMerck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rajamuthu SrinivasanSanofi Pasteur, Marcy L'Etoile, France.
Claudia StarkPreclinical Development, Pharma Research and Early Development, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Kary E ThompsonNonclinical Safety, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0412-0432
Katie J TurnerNonclinical Safety, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paul BarrowPharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHBayer (Germany) · DEJanssen (Belgium) · BEUnited States Military Academy · USAbbVie (United States) · USAstraZeneca (France) · FRAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEEli Lilly (United States) · USIpsen (France) · FRPfizer (United States) · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHSanofi (France) · FRServier (France) · FRUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents a European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association/PreClinical Development Expert Group (EFPIA-PDEG) topic group consensus on a data-driven approach to harmonized contraception recommendations for clinical trial protocols and product labeling. There is no international agreement in pharmaceutical clinical trial protocols or product labeling on when/if female and/or male contraception is warranted and for how long after the last dose. This absence of consensus has resulted in different recommendations among regions. For most pharmaceuticals, contraception recommendations are generally based exclusively on nonclinical data and/or mechanism. For clinical trials, contraception is the default position and is maintained for women throughout clinical development, whereas appropriate information can justify removing male contraception. Conversely, contraception is only recommended in product labeling when warranted. A base case rationale is proposed for whether or not female and/or male contraception is/are warranted, using available genotoxicity and developmental toxicity data. Contraception is generally warranted for both male and female subjects treated with mutagenic pharmaceuticals. We propose as a starting point that contraception is not typically warranted when the margin is 10-fold or greater between clinical exposure at the maximum recommended human dose and exposure at the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for purely aneugenic pharmaceuticals and for pharmaceuticals that induce fetal malformations or embryo-fetal lethality. Other factors are discussed, including contraception methods, pregnancy testing, drug clearance, options for managing the absence of a developmental toxicity NOAEL, drug-drug interactions, radiopharmaceuticals, and other drug modalities. Overall, we present a data-driven rationale that can serve as a basis for consistent contraception recommendations in clinical trials and in product labeling across regions.

Indexed as

ContraceptionDrug IndustryConsensusFemaleHumansMaleNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelPharmaceutical PreparationsPregnancyPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID35388453
PMCPMC10083981
OpenAlexW4224295452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.