ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023
Science-Based Approach to Harmonize Contraception Recommendations in Clinical Trials and Pharmaceutical Labels.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07301320 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Prospective, Investigator-Initiated Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Epetraborole in Patients With Mycobacterium Abscessus Lung Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Prospective, Investigator-Initiated Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Epetraborole in Patients With Mycobacterium Abscessus Lung Disease: REBOUND Study
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-in-human safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pilot food-effect study of the candidate antimalarial compound MMV367.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Trial
- First-in-human safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pilot food-effect study of the candidate antimalarial compound MMV367.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Pathway-specific mechanisms, therapeutic applications, and toxicodynamic profile of acriflavine in cancer: a comprehensive review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Ethical complexities in contraceptive mandates for adolescent clinical trial participation: a qualitative analysis of U.S. adolescents' perspectives.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Prospective Cohort Study of Felzartamab in Rituximab-Resistant Primary Membranous Nephropathy.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Prospective Cohort Study of Obinutuzumab in Rituximab-Resistant Primary Membranous Nephropathy.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- 'It is scary to pause treatment': perspectives on HIV cure-related research and analytical treatment interruptions from women diagnosed during acute HIV in Durban, South Africa.HIV research & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Contraception Requirements in Early Clinical Trials: Considerations Towards an Evidence-Based Approach.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Treated with Upadacitinib: Analysis of Data from Clinical Trials and Postmarketing Reports.Drug safety · 2024Article
- Responding to the Call to Action: Framework to Accelerate Clinical Data Generation for Antiretroviral Use in Pregnant Individuals with HIV.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review presents a European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association/PreClinical Development Expert Group (EFPIA-PDEG) topic group consensus on a data-driven approach to harmonized contraception recommendations for clinical trial protocols and product labeling. There is no international agreement in pharmaceutical clinical trial protocols or product labeling on when/if female and/or male contraception is warranted and for how long after the last dose. This absence of consensus has resulted in different recommendations among regions. For most pharmaceuticals, contraception recommendations are generally based exclusively on nonclinical data and/or mechanism. For clinical trials, contraception is the default position and is maintained for women throughout clinical development, whereas appropriate information can justify removing male contraception. Conversely, contraception is only recommended in product labeling when warranted. A base case rationale is proposed for whether or not female and/or male contraception is/are warranted, using available genotoxicity and developmental toxicity data. Contraception is generally warranted for both male and female subjects treated with mutagenic pharmaceuticals. We propose as a starting point that contraception is not typically warranted when the margin is 10-fold or greater between clinical exposure at the maximum recommended human dose and exposure at the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for purely aneugenic pharmaceuticals and for pharmaceuticals that induce fetal malformations or embryo-fetal lethality. Other factors are discussed, including contraception methods, pregnancy testing, drug clearance, options for managing the absence of a developmental toxicity NOAEL, drug-drug interactions, radiopharmaceuticals, and other drug modalities. Overall, we present a data-driven rationale that can serve as a basis for consistent contraception recommendations in clinical trials and in product labeling across regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.