Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35388175›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2022

Neural responses to reward anticipation and feedback in adult and adolescent cannabis users and controls.

Martine Skumlien, Claire Mokrysz, Tom P Freeman, Matthew B Wall, Michael Bloomfield, Rachel Lees, Anna Borissova, Kat Petrilli, James Carson, Tiernan Coughlan and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Acute effects of different types of cannabis on young adult and adolescent resting-state brain networks.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Consequences of adolescent drug use.Translational psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martine SkumlienDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ms2610@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3552-2653
Claire MokryszClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Tom P FreemanClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Matthew B WallClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Michael BloomfieldDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1972-4610
Rachel LeesClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Anna BorissovaClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Kat PetrilliClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
James CarsonClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Tiernan CoughlanClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Shelan OforiClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Christelle LangleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5061-2820
Barbara J SahakianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-1745
H Valerie CurranClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.
Will LawnClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology Department, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0143-2724
University College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBInvicro (United Kingdom) · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/P012728/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200181/Z//15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic use of drugs may alter the brain's reward system, though the extant literature concerning long-term cannabis use and neural correlates of reward processing has shown mixed results. Adolescents may be more vulnerable to the adverse effects of cannabis than adults; however, this has not been investigated for reward processing. As part of the 'CannTeen' study, in the largest functional magnetic resonance imaging study of reward processing and cannabis use to date, we investigated reward anticipation and feedback in 125 adult (26-29 years) and adolescent (16-17 years) cannabis users (1-7 days/week cannabis use) and gender- and age-matched controls, using the Monetary Incentive Delay task. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent responses were examined using region of interest (ROI) analyses in the bilateral ventral striatum for reward anticipation and right ventral striatum and left ventromedial prefrontal cortex for feedback, and exploratory whole-brain analyses. Results showed no User-Group or User-Group × Age-Group effects during reward anticipation or feedback in pre-defined ROIs. These null findings were supported by post hoc Bayesian analyses. However, in the whole-brain analysis, cannabis users had greater feedback activity in the prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex compared to controls. In conclusion, cannabis users and controls had similar neural responses during reward anticipation and in hypothesised reward-related regions during reward feedback. The whole-brain analysis revealed tentative evidence of greater fronto-parietal activity in cannabis users during feedback. Adolescents showed no increased vulnerability compared with adults. Overall, reward anticipation and feedback processing appear spared in adolescent and adult cannabis users, but future longitudinal studies are needed to corroborate this.

Indexed as

CannabisAdolescentAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalBayes TheoremFeedbackHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotivationOxygenRewardOxygen

Identifiers

PMID35388175
PMCPMC9485226
OpenAlexW4225768599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.