Trial reportScientific reports2022
Randomized controlled trial of early endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in acute coronary syndrome patients.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02618980 (Management of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients by Early Endoscopy and Non-Endoscopy Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Management of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients by Early Endoscopy and Non-Endoscopy Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Value of Serum Pepsinogen and Gastrin-17 in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome for Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Oral Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-Associated Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- Risk factors for drug-related gastrointestinal ulcer:a retrospective pharmacovigilance study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of endoscopy in patients with concomitant gastrointestinal bleeding and acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Elevated serum glutathione peroxidase levels reducing the risk of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding combined with acute coronary syndrome: Evidence from observational, interventional, and Mendelian randomization studies.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Dual antiplatelet therapy in GI-bleed patients with extensive coronary artery disease history: a systematic review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Influencing Factors (History of Alcohol Consumption) and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model for In-Hospital Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage in a Certain Hospital.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Proton pump inhibitors display anti-tumour potential in glioma.Cell proliferation · 2023Review
- The Clinical Dilemma of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cardiovascular Disease Patients: A Nationwide-Based Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are not uncommon, particularly under dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The efficiency and safety of early endoscopy (EE) for UGIB in these patients needs to be elucidated. This multicenter randomized controlled trial randomized recent ACS patients presenting acute UGIB to non-EE and EE groups. All eligible patients received intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy. Those in EE group underwent therapeutic endoscopy within 24 h after bleeding. The data regarding efficacy and safety of EE were analyzed. It was early terminated because the UGIB rate was lower than expected and interim analysis was done. In total, 43 patients were randomized to non-EE (21 patients) and EE (22 patients) groups. The failure rate of control hemorrhage (intention-to-treat [ITT] 4.55% vs. 23.81%, p < 0.001; per-protocol [PP] 0% vs. 4.55%, p = 0.058) and 3-day rebleeding rate (ITT 4.55% vs. 28.57%, p = 0.033; PP 0% vs. 21.05%, p = 0.027) were lower in EE than non-EE group. The mortality, minor and major complication rates were not different between two groups. Male patients were at higher risk of minor and major complications after EE with OR (95% CI) of 3.50 (1.15-10.63) and 4.25 (1.43-12.63), respectively. In multivariate analysis, EE was associated with lower needs for blood transfusion (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.98). Among patients who discontinued DAPT during acute UGIB, a higher risk (OR 5.25, 95% CI 1.21-22.74) of coronary artery stent re-thrombosis within 6 months was noticed. EE for acute UGIB in recent ACS patients has higher rate of bleeding control, lower 3-day rebleeding rate and lower needs for blood transfusion, but more complications in male patients. Further enrollment is mandatory to avoid bias from small sample size (ClinicalTrial.gov Number NCT02618980, registration date 02/12/2015).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.