ArticleScientific reports2022
A hybrid feature extraction scheme for efficient malonylation site prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- EACVP: An ESM-2 LM Framework Combined CNN and CBAM Attention to Predict Anti-coronavirus Peptides.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Radiomics of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Predicting Radiation-Induced Hepatic Toxicity After Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Machine Learning Predictive Model Based on the SHAP Methodology.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- A Computational Predictor for Accurate Identification of Tumor Homing Peptides by Integrating Sequential and Deep BiLSTM Features.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- Analysis and review of techniques and tools based on machine learning and deep learning for prediction of lysine malonylation sites in protein sequences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lysine malonylation is one of the most important post-translational modifications (PTMs). It affects the functionality of cells. Malonylation site prediction in proteins can unfold the mechanisms of cellular functionalities. Experimental methods are one of the due prediction approaches. But they are typically costly and time-consuming to implement. Recently, methods based on machine-learning solutions have been proposed to tackle this problem. Such practices have been shown to reduce costs and time complexities and increase accuracy. However, these approaches also have specific shortcomings, including inappropriate feature extraction out of protein sequences, high-dimensional features, and inefficient underlying classifiers. A machine learning-based method is proposed in this paper to cope with these problems. In the proposed approach, seven different features are extracted. Then, the extracted features are combined, ranked based on the Fisher's score (F-score), and the most efficient ones are selected. Afterward, malonylation sites are predicted using various classifiers. Simulation results show that the proposed method has acceptable performance compared with some state-of-the-art approaches. In addition, the XGBOOST classifier, founded on extracted features such as TFCRF, has a higher prediction rate than the other methods. The codes are publicly available at: https://github.com/jimy2020/Malonylation-site-prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.