Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387847›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2022

Validity and reliability of a new incremental step test for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Rui Vilarinho, Lúcia Serra, Ana Águas, Carlos Alves, Pedro Matos Silva, Cátia Caneiras, António Mesquita Montes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04715659 (A Novel Incremental Step Test as an Alternative for the Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Patients With COPD - The Study of Its Measurement Properties), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04715659 unknown statusnot on this map

A Novel Incremental Step Test as an Alternative for the Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Patients With COPD - The Study of Its Measurement Properties

TypeobservationalSponsorPolytechnic Institute of PortoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsCOPDArmsPerformance of step test (number of steps) for the assessment of exercise capacity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rui VilarinhoDepartment of Physiotherapy and Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Health of Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal ruivilarinho1@gmail.com.
Lúcia SerraHealthcare Department, Nippon Gases Portugal, Maia, Portugal.
Ana ÁguasHealthcare Department, Nippon Gases Portugal, Maia, Portugal.
Carlos AlvesPulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro, Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Pedro Matos SilvaDepartment of Physiotherapy and Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Health of Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Cátia CaneirasHealthcare Department, Nippon Gases Portugal, Maia, Portugal.
António Mesquita MontesDepartment of Physiotherapy and Center for Rehabilitation Research, School of Health of Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncremental step tests (IST) can be used to assess exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The development of a new step test based on the characteristics of the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) is an important study to explore. We aimed to develop a new IST based on the ISWT in people with COPD, and assess its validity (construct validity) and reliability, according to Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in participants recruited from hospitals/clinics. During the recruitment, the participants who presented a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) report in the previous month were also identified and the respective data was collected. Subsequently, participants attended two sessions at their homes. IST was conducted on the first visit, along with the 1 min sit-to-stand (1MSTS) test. IST was repeated on a second visit, performed 5-7 days after the first one. Spearman's correlations were used for construct validity, by comparing the IST with the 6MWT and the 1MSTS. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC

results50 participants (70.8±7.5 years) were enrolled. IST was significant and moderate correlated with the 6MWT (ρ=0.50, p=0.020), and with the 1MSTS (ρ=0.46, p=0.001). IST presented an ICC

conclusionDespite the significant and moderate correlations with the 6MWT and 1MSTS, the inability to full compliance with the COSMIN recommendations does not yet allow the IST to be considered valid in people with COPD. On the other hand, the IST is a reliable test based on its high ICC, but a learning effect and an 'indeterminate' measurement error were shown. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04715659.

Indexed as

Exercise TestPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsWalk Testexercisepulmonary rehabilitationrespiratory measurement

Identifiers

PMID35387847
PMCPMC8987783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.