Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387783›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Clinical effectiveness of one ultrasound guided intra-articular corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection in addition to advice and education for hip osteoarthritis (HIT trial): single blind, parallel group, three arm, randomised controlled trial.

Zoe Paskins, Kieran Bromley, Martyn Lewis, Gemma Hughes, Emily Hughes, Susie Hennings, Andrea Cherrington, Alison Hall, Melanie A Holden, Kay Stevenson and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [2024 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip (summary) interpretation].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Interpretation and Examples: Key Updates in CONSORT 2025].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Zoe PaskinsPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7783-2986
Kieran BromleyKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Martyn LewisKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Gemma HughesKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Emily HughesKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Susie HenningsKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Andrea CherringtonKeele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Alison HallPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Melanie A HoldenPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Kay StevensonHaywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Ajit MenonHaywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Philip RobertsUniversity Hospitals North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
George PeatPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Clare JinksPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Jesse KigoziHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Raymond OppongHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nadine E FosterSurgical Treatment And Rehabilitation Service (STARS), Research and Education Alliance, University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane QLD, Australia.
Christian D MallenPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Edward RoddySurgical Treatment And Rehabilitation Service (STARS), Research and Education Alliance, University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane QLD, Australia.
Arthritis UK · GBKeele University · GBMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the clinical effectiveness of adding a single ultrasound guided intra-articular hip injection of corticosteroid and local anaesthetic to advice and education in adults with hip osteoarthritis.

designPragmatic, three arm, parallel group, single blind, randomised controlled trial.

settingTwo community musculoskeletal services in England.

participants199 adults aged ≥40 years with hip osteoarthritis and at least moderate pain: 67 were randomly assigned to receive advice and education (best current treatment (BCT)), 66 to BCT plus ultrasound guided injection of triamcinolone and lidocaine, and 66 to BCT plus ultrasound guided injection of lidocaine.

interventionsBCT alone, BCT plus ultrasound guided intra-articular hip injection of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4 mL 1% lidocaine hydrochloride, or BCT plus ultrasound guided intra-articular hip injection of 5 mL 1% lidocaine. Participants in the ultrasound guided arms were masked to the injection they received.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was self-reported current intensity of hip pain (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale) over six months. Outcomes were self-reported at two weeks and at two, four, and six months.

resultsMean age of the study sample was 62.8 years (standard deviation 10.0) and 113 (57%) were women. Average weighted follow-up rate across time points was 93%. Greater mean improvement in hip pain intensity over six months was reported with BCT plus ultrasound-triamcinolone-lidocaine compared with BCT: mean difference -1.43 (95% confidence interval -2.15 to -0.72), P<0.001; standardised mean difference -0.55 (-0.82 to -0.27). No difference in hip pain intensity over six months was reported between BCT plus ultrasound-triamcinolone-lidocaine compared with BCT plus ultrasound-lidocaine (-0.52 (-1.21 to 0.18)). The presence of ultrasound confirmed synovitis or effusion was associated with a significant interaction effect favouring BCT plus ultrasound-triamcinolone-lidocaine (-1.70 (-3.10 to -0.30)). One participant in the BCT plus ultrasound-triamcinolone-lidocaine group with a bioprosthetic aortic valve died from subacute bacterial endocarditis four months after the intervention, deemed possibly related to the trial treatment.

conclusionsUltrasound guided intra-articular hip injection of triamcinolone is a treatment option to add to BCT for people with hip osteoarthritis.

trial registrationEudraCT 2014-003412-37; ISRCTN50550256.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalOsteoarthritis, HipAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultArthralgiaFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularLidocaineMiddle AgedPainSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeTriamcinoloneUltrasonography, InterventionalAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineTriamcinolone

Identifiers

PMID35387783
PMCPMC8984871
OpenAlexW4223491599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.