Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387751›Full record

ArticleJACC. Clinical electrophysiology2022

Clinical Impact of Residual Leaks Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry.

Mohamad Alkhouli, Chengan Du, Ammar Killu, Trevor Simard, Peter A Noseworthy, Paul A Friedman, Jeptha P Curtis, James V Freeman, David R Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Risk factors, clinical implications, and management of peridevice leak following left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Mechanisms, predictors, and evolution of severe peri-device leaks with two different left atrial appendage occluders.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  7. Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Past, Present, and Future.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention: current challenges and future perspectives.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohamad AlkhouliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: Alkhouli.Mohamad@mayo.edu.
Chengan DuSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Ammar KilluDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Trevor SimardDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Peter A NoseworthyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul A FriedmanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jeptha P CurtisSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
James V FreemanSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
David R HolmesDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Atrial Fibrillation (SAFELY-AF)R01HL142765 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FREEMAN, JAMES · 2019 to 2022
$2.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on the impact of residual peri-device leak after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are limited.

objectivesThe goal of this study was to explore the association of peri-device leak with adverse clinical events.

methodsThe National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO Registry was queried to identify patients undergoing LAAO between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Patients were classified according to leak size on echocardiography at 45 ± 14 days (0 mm, no leak; >0-5 mm, small leak; and >5 mm, large leak).

resultsA total of 51,333 patients were included, of whom 37,696 (73.4%) had no leak, 13,258 (25.8%) had small leaks, and 379 (0.7%) had large leaks. The proportion of patients on warfarin at 45 days was higher in the large vs small or no leak cohorts (44.9% vs 34.4% and 32.4%, respectively; P < 0.001). At 6 and 12 months, anticoagulant utilization decreased but remained more frequent in patients with large leaks. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were uncommon in all groups. However, compared with patients with no leak, those with small leaks had slightly higher odds of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolization (adjusted HR: 1.152; 95% CI: 1.025-1.294), major bleeding (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.029-1.120), and any major adverse events (HR: 1.102; 95% CI: 1.048-1.160). There were no significant differences in adverse events between patients with large leaks and patients with small or no leaks.

conclusionsSmall (>0-5 mm) leaks after LAAO were associated with a modestly higher incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events; large leaks (>5 mm) were not associated with adverse events, although higher proportions of these patients were maintained on anticoagulation. Newer devices with improved seal might mitigate the events associated with residual leaks.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationThromboembolismHumansRegistriesTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeatrial fibrillationischemic strokeleft atrial appendageperi-device leak

Identifiers

PMID35387751
PMCPMC9233062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.