Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387692›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of nutrition2023

Downsizing food: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of reducing served food portion sizes on daily energy intake and body weight.

Eric Robinson, India McFarland-Lesser, Zina Patel, Andrew Jones

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the relationship between portion size and indexes of adiposity in children.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric RobinsonDepartment of Psychology, Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 7ZA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-5533
India McFarland-LesserDepartment of Psychology, Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 7ZA, UK.
Zina PatelDepartment of Psychology, Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 7ZA, UK.
Andrew JonesDepartment of Psychology, Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 7ZA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Portion sizes of many foods have increased over time. However, the size of effect that reducing food portion sizes has on daily energy intake and body weight is less clear. We used a systematic review methodology to identify eligible articles that used an experimental design to manipulate portion size served to human participants and measured energy intake for a minimum of 1 d. Searches were conducted in September 2020 and again in October 2021. Fourteen eligible studies contributing eighty-five effects were included in the primary meta-analysis. There was a moderate-to-large reduction in daily energy intake when comparing smaller

Indexed as

Energy IntakePortion SizeBody WeightFoodHumansWeight GainEnergy intakeFood reformulationObesityPortion sizeWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID35387692
PMCPMC9975786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.