ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by different obesity indices.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trends in gestational diabetes prevalence in China from 1990 to 2024: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Body Roundness Index and A Body Shape Index as First-Trimester Risk-Stratification Markers for Gestational Diabetes in Overweight Pregnant Women Without Established Major Risk Factors: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Screening and Prognostic Performance of Pre-Pregnancy BMI for Predicting Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of the Internet of Things for Improving Pregnancy and Postpartum Women's Health in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Impact of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Disease Knowledge, and Health Behaviors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Review
- Correlation between Overweight, Obesity, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Adipokines (Adipolin and Adiponectin), and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Are miR-26a and miR-26b microRNAs potent prognostic markers of gestational diabetes?Health science reports · 2024Article
- Role of Nutritional Habits during Pregnancy in the Developing of Gestational Diabetes: A Single-Center Observational Clinical Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Clinical and Biochemical Markers in Early Pregnancy for Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence rates of obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are increasing in parallel. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between different obesity indices, including prepregnancy body mass index (preBMI), the first-trimester abdominal circumference (AC), and first-trimester abdominal circumference/height ratio (ACHtR), and GDM, and the efficacy of these three indices in predicting GDM was assessed.
methodsA total of 15,472 pregnant women gave birth to a singleton at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Prepregnancy weight was self-reported by study participants, body height and AC were measured by nurses at the first prenatal visit during weeks 11 to 13
resultsA total of 1912 women (12.4%) were diagnosed with GDM. Logistic regression analysis showed that AC, ACHtR, and preBMI (P < 0.001) were all independent risk factors for the development of GDM. In the normal BMI population, the higher the AC or ACHtR was, the more likely the pregnant woman was to develop GDM. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.62-0.64) for the AC, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62-0.65) for the ACHtR and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.62-0.64) for the preBMI. An AC ≥ 80.3 cm (sensitivity: 61.6%; specificity: 57.9%), an ACHtR of ≥ 0.49 (sensitivity: 67.3%; specificity: 54.0%), and a preBMI ≥ 22.7 (sensitivity: 48.4%; specificity: 71.8%) were determined to be the best cut-off levels for identifying subjects with GDM.
conclusionsAn increase in ACHtR may be an independent risk factor for GDM in the first trimester of pregnancy. Even in the normal BMI population, the higher the AC and ACHtR are, the more likely a pregnant woman is to develop GDM. AC, ACHtR in the first trimester and preBMI might be anthropometric indices for predicting GDM, but a single obesity index had limited predictive value for GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.