Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387593›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Adverse pregnancy outcome disclosure and women's social networks: a qualitative multi-country study with implications for improved reporting in surveys.

Doris Kwesiga, Leif Eriksson, Christopher Garimoi Orach, Charlotte Tawiah, Md Ali Imam, Ane B Fisker, Yeetey Enuameh, Joy E Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Peter Waiswa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Doris KwesigaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University; Uppsala Global Health Research On Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. dknnkwesiga@gmail.com.
Leif ErikssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University; Uppsala Global Health Research On Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christopher Garimoi OrachDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Charlotte TawiahKintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana.
Md Ali ImamMaternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ane B FiskerBandim Health Project, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Yeetey EnuamehKintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana.
Joy E LawnMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Hannah BlencoweMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Peter WaiswaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Hannah BradbyDepartment of Sociology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mats MalqvistDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University; Uppsala Global Health Research On Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, approximately 6,700 newborn deaths and 5,400 stillbirths occur daily. The true figure is likely higher, with under reporting of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) noted. Decision-making in health is influenced by various factors, including one's social networks. We sought to understand APOs disclosure within social networks in Uganda, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau and Bangladesh and how this could improve formal reporting of APOs in surveys. 

methodsA qualitative, exploratory multi-country study was conducted within four health and demographic surveillance system sites. 16 focus group discussions were held with 147 women aged 15-49 years, who had participated in a recent household survey. Thematic analysis, with both deductive and inductive elements, using three pre-defined themes of Sender, Message and Receiver was done using NVivo software.

resultsDisclosure of APOs was a community concern, with news often shared with people around the bereaved for different reasons, including making sense of what happened and decision-making roles of receivers. Social networks responded with comfort, providing emotional, in-kind and financial support. Key decision makers included men, spiritual and traditional leaders. Non-disclosure was usually to avoid rumors in cases of induced abortions, or after a previous bad experience with health workers, who were frequently excluded from disclosure, except for instances where a woman sought advice on APOs.

conclusionsCommunities must understand why they should report APOs and to whom. Efforts to improve APOs reporting could be guided by diffusion of innovation theory, for instance for community entry and sensitization before the survey, since it highlights how information can be disseminated through community role models. In this case, these gatekeepers we identified could promote reporting of APOs. The stage at which a person is in decision-making, what kind of adopter they are and their take on the benefits and other attributes of reporting are important. In moving beyond survey reporting to getting better routine data, the theory would be applicable too. Health workers should demonstrate a more comforting and supportive response to APOs as the social networks do, which could encourage more bereaved women to inform them and seek care.

Indexed as

DisclosurePregnancy OutcomeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchSocial NetworkingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAdverse pregnancy outcomesDiffusion of innovationDisclosureSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID35387593
PMCPMC8988398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.