SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Eight Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Controversies in Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Literature Review.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Occurrence of intraocular hemorrhages under monotherapy or combination therapy of antiplatelets and anticoagulants using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is facing major treatment problems in clinical practice. Methods: We firstly conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis to study the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic regimens. Only randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were included in our study. The Bayesian random-effects model was used in this study. The primary safety and efficacy outcomes were major bleeding according to the criteria of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events, respectively. The secondary safety outcomes were combined TIMI major and minor bleeding, trial-defined primary bleeding events, and intracranial hemorrhage. The secondary efficacy outcomes were all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and hospitalization. Results: Total of 11,532 patients from the five randomized controlled trials were analyzed, of whom 8,426 were male. Compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus P2Y12 inhibitor, the odds ratios (95% credible intervals) for TIMI major bleeding were 1.70 (0.77-3.80) for VKA plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), 1.20 (0.30-4.60) for rivaroxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.00 (0.25-3.90) for rivaroxaban plus DAPT, 0.76 (0.21-2.80) for dabigatran plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 0.71 (0.25-2.10) for apixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.40 (0.52-3.80) for apixaban plus DAPT, and 1.00 (0.27-4.00) for edoxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor. For trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events, compared with VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor, the odds ratios (95% credible intervals) were 1.10 (0.61-2.00) for VKA plus DAPT, 1.20 (0.45-3.70) for rivaroxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.10 (0.38-3.20) for rivaroxaban plus DAPT, 1.10 (0.43-3.10) for dabigatran plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.00 (0.47-2.20) for apixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 0.99 (0.46-2.20) for apixaban plus DAPT, and 1.20 (0.43-3.40) for edoxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor. Apixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor was the highest-ranking of safety outcomes and VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor was the highest-ranking of efficacy outcomes other than trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events. Conclusion: Apixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor seems to be linked with fewer bleeding complications while retaining antithrombotic efficacy. Moreover, for most efficacy indicators, the ranking of VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor is still very high. Systematic Review Registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42020149894].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.