Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387296›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Photoelastic Stress Field Recovery Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Bo Tao, Yan Wang, Xinbo Qian, Xiliang Tong, Fuqiang He, Weiping Yao, Bin Chen, Baojia Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Time Optimal Trajectory Planing Based on Improved Sparrow Search Algorithm.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural-Network-Based Model-Free Calibration Method for Stereo Fisheye Camera.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bo TaoKey Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yan WangKey Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xinbo QianHubei Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission and Manufacturing Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiliang TongPrecision Manufacturing Institute, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fuqiang HeResearch Center for Biomimetic Robot and Intelligent Measurement and Control, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Weiping YaoResearch Center for Biomimetic Robot and Intelligent Measurement and Control, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bin ChenResearch Center for Biomimetic Robot and Intelligent Measurement and Control, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Baojia ChenHubei Key Laboratory of Hydroelectric Machinery Design and Maintenance, China Three Gorges University, CTGU, Yichang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has shown that deep convolutional neural network is capable of solving inverse problems in computational imaging, and recovering the stress field of the loaded object from the photoelastic fringe pattern can also be regarded as an inverse problem solving process. However, the formation of the fringe pattern is affected by the geometry of the specimen and experimental configuration. When the loaded object produces complex fringe distribution, the traditional stress analysis methods still face difficulty in unwrapping. In this study, a deep convolutional neural network based on the encoder-decoder structure is proposed, which can accurately decode stress distribution information from complex photoelastic fringe images generated under different experimental configurations. The proposed method is validated on a synthetic dataset, and the quality of stress distribution images generated by the network model is evaluated using mean squared error (MSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and other evaluation indexes. The results show that the proposed stress recovery network can achieve an average performance of more than 0.99 on the SSIM.

Indexed as

deep learningdigital photoelasticityinverse problem solvingneural networkstress evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35387296
PMCPMC8978563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.