Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387225›Full record

SynthesisComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis after Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sheng Wang, Leilei Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheng WangAffiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Spine Surgery, 261031 Weifang, Shandong, China.
Leilei WuAffiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Spine Surgery, 261031 Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-1857
Weifang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Venous thrombosis, comprising DVT and PE, is an orthopedic condition that may be fatal after surgery. This study's purpose was to analyze risk factors for venous thrombosis following spine surgery to help guide treatment prophylaxis. Methods: A computer searched English databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Academic for relevant publications after spinal surgery. Preoperative walking difficulties, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, preoperative bleeding volume, etc., were all examined using the NOS scale. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software. An analysis was done. Due to the study's differences, the data was compiled using fixed effects or random effects models. Results: A total of 25 studies were considered, with a total of 1,927,781 individuals after spine surgery, including 7843 patients with venous thrombosis. The included literatures had NOS scores ranging from 5 to 8. According to the findings of the meta-analysis, the age of patients with venous thrombosis after spinal surgery (OR = 7.53, 95% CI (6.73, 8.33)), blood loss (OR = -141.79, 95% CI (-154.68, -128.9), Conclusion: High age, female, spinal fusion, big volume blood loss patients, operation time, and hypertension, diabetes, and walking issue are all risk factors for venous thrombosis following surgery.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHypertensionVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisFemaleHemorrhageHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35387225
PMCPMC8977314
OpenAlexW4220756448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.