ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022
The Correlation of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Eosinophil Count with SCORTEN in SJS/TEN.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunological and Inflammatory Characteristics of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- A high eosinophil proportion increases the risk of skin-related adverse events induced by apalutamide in patients with prostate cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker in SJS/TEN patients.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Clinical Features of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor versus Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Drugs in China: A Cross-Sectional Study and Literature Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are acute severe cutaneous adverse reactions commonly caused by medication. Precise evaluation of disease severity in initial setting must be obtained to start appropriate treatment. Neutrophil and lymphocyte ratio (NLR) plays a role in displaying inflammatory reaction while eosinophils count (EC) influences immunological dysregulation including the proliferation of cytotoxic cells in early onset of SJS/TEN. Objective: To evaluate whether NLR and EC serve as prognostic markers of disease severity in patients with SJS/TEN using SCORTEN. Methods: A single center study with retrospective study included SJS/TEN patients at Dr. Moewardi General Hospital Surakarta in January 1st 2018-December 31st 2020. The required laboratory data was assessed at the beginning of the patient's admission through medical records. The significance analysis were performed using one-way ANOVA and Spearman while the receiver-operator curve were used to evaluate the prognostic value of variables for severity in SJS/TEN patients. Results: The total sample in this study was 24 patients with majority female (58%) and range from 25 to >50 years (54%). The results demonstrated of significant difference and positively correlated between NLR and EC with severity of SJS/TEN (p<0.01; r>0.05). The specificity and sensitivity of 51%;61% and 70%;60%, respectively. Conclusion: NLR and EC can be used as prognosticators of severity in SJS/TEN while further research on other inflammatory markers with increased number of samples and study centers are needed to provide more actual data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.