ArticleBioactive materials2022
Systemic and single cell level responses to 1 nm size biomaterials demonstrate distinct biological effects revealed by multi-omics atlas.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mosaic: Single-Cell Atlas of Stress.Cells · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials in Targeted Immunotherapy for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Focusing on Immune Cell Modulation and Precision Treatment.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Ru Complex-Functionalized Au Nanospheres for Suppressing Tumor Growth and Metastasis: Photothermal Therapy Combined with Chemotherapy Using Nanoplatforms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Mgp High-Expressing MSCs Orchestrate the Osteoimmune Microenvironment of Collagen/Nanohydroxyapatite-Mediated Bone Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- A pathological joint-liver axis mediated by matrikine-activated CD4Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Article
- Calcium Phosphate Delivery Systems for Regeneration and Biomineralization of Mineralized Tissues of the Craniofacial Complex.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Immunomodulatory Biomaterials and Emerging Analytical Techniques for Probing the Immune Micro-Environment.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although ultra-small nanoclusters (USNCs, < 2 nm) have immense application capabilities in biomedicine, the investigation on body-wide organ responses towards USNCs is scant. Here, applying a novel strategy of single-cell mass cytometry combined with Nano Genome Atlas of multi-tissues, we systematically evaluate the interactions between the host and calcium phosphate (CaP) USNCs at the organism level. Combining single-cell mass cytometry, and magnetic luminex assay results, we identify dynamic immune responses to CaP USNCs at the single cell resolution. The innate immune is initially activated and followed by adaptive immune activation, as evidenced by dynamic immune cells proportions. Furthermore, using Nano Genome Atlas of multi-tissues, we uncover CaP USNCs induce stronger activation of the immune responses in the cartilage and subchondral bone among the five local tissues while promote metabolic activities in the liver and kidney. Moreover, based on the immunological response profiles, histological evaluation of major organs and local tissue, and a body-wide transcriptomics, we demonstrate that CaP USNCs are not more hazardous than the Food and Drug Administration-approved CaP nanoparticles after 14 days of injection. Our findings provide valuable information on the future clinical applications of USNCs and introduce an innovative strategy to decipher the whole body response to implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.