Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35387050›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in allergy2021

Pharmacological, Technological, and Digital Innovative Aspects in Rhinology.

Rosanna Ruggiero, Giovanni Motta, Giuseppe Massaro, Concetta Rafaniello, Alberto Della Corte, Antonella De Angelis, Annalisa Capuano, Gaetano Motta, Francesco Rossi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Essential Reads in Rhinology: A Bibliometric Analysis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  4. Digital Twins in Healthcare and Their Applicability in Rhinology: A Narrative Review.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosanna RuggieroCampania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni MottaDepartment of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe MassaroDepartment of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Concetta RafanielloCampania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Naples, Italy.
Alberto Della CorteDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Antonella De AngelisDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Annalisa CapuanoCampania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Naples, Italy.
Gaetano MottaDepartment of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Francesco RossiCampania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITRegione Campania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovation refers to the introduction of a product, a process, a service or a solution resulting in something new or significantly improved compared to the already available alternatives. In the clinical context, it is strictly related to the identification of a new added value in terms of quality, therapeutic efficacy and safety. Over the years several innovative approaches have been introduced in the clinical practice, revolutionizing the treatment and the management of important rhinologic conditions. Innovative tools, including new drugs, biomaterials, and mobile applications seem to be able to improve the clinical outcomes and the quality of life of many patients affected by (often relapsing) rhinologic diseases. Among the main modern pharmacological innovations, mention must be made of the biological drugs like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Recently, new mAbs have been introduced and investigated as useful arms in the treatment of some inflammatory/infectious or oncological diseases affecting the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses. The already approved or still investigated mAbs work inhibiting different type 2 inflammation pathways, including those mediated by IgE (omalizumab), IL-4/IL-13 (dupilumab), and IL-5 (mepolizumab). Moreover, considering the higher expression of PD-L1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the use of PD-1 inhibitors, such as nivolumab, or a dual CTLA-4/PD-1 blockade (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) appear to be an effective strategy for the treatment of this cancer form. The implants with bio-absorbable biomaterials represent new interesting available technological innovations. Moreover, advanced technologies such as the artificial intelligence, the machine learning as well as the augmented or virtual reality have also proved useful in rhinologic field with main impacts on precision medicine and surgery. Finally, the development and use of mobile-Health tools represent a winning strategy in monitoring of the therapy success, safety and tolerability as well as the progress of chronic disease including chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Supporting the research of innovative tools and strategies (including pharmacological, technologic, or digital ones) is essential to improve the management of chronic diseases that significantly affect the patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)digital innovationdupilumabmepolizumabmonoclonal antibodiespharmacological innovationrhinologytechnological innovation

Identifiers

PMID35387050
PMCPMC8974665
OpenAlexW4200126518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.