ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2022
Real-time Markerless Tracking of Lung Tumors based on 2-D Fluoroscopy Imaging using Convolutional LSTM.
Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging lung tumor motion using integrated-mode proton radiography-A phantom study towards tumor tracking in proton radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based target tracking with X-ray images for radiotherapy: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Current Research Status of Respiratory Motion for Thorax and Abdominal Treatment: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of tracking targets in 2D fluor images using a novel deep learning network. Methods: Our model design aims to capture the consistent motion of tumors in fluoroscopic images by neural network. Specifically, the model is trained by generative adversarial methods. The network is a coarse-to-fine architecture design. Convolutional LSTM (Long Short-term Memory) modules are introduced to account for the time correlation between different frames of the fluoroscopic images. The model was trained and tested on a digital X-CAT phantom in two studies. Series of coherent 2D fluoroscopic images representing the full respiration cycle were fed into the model to predict the localized tumor regions. In first study to test on massive scenarios, phantoms of different scales, tumor positions, sizes, and respiration amplitudes were generated to evaluate the accuracy of the model comprehensively. In second study to test on specific sample, phantoms were generated with fixed body and tumor sizes but different respiration amplitudes to investigate the effects of motion amplitude on the tracking accuracy. The tracking accuracy was quantitatively evaluated using intersection over union (IOU), tumor area difference, and centroid of mass difference (COMD). Results: In the first comprehensive study, the mean IOU and dice coefficient achieved 0.93±0.04 and 0.96±0.02. The mean tumor area difference was 4.34%±4.04%. And the COMD was 0.16 cm and 0.07 cm on average in SI (superior-interior) and LR (left-right) directions, respectively. In the second amplitude study, the mean IOU and dice coefficient achieved 0.98 and 0.99. The mean tumor difference was 0.17%. And the COMD was 0.03cm and 0.01 cm on average in SI and LR directions, respectively. Results demonstrated the robustness of our model against breathing variations. Conclusion: Our study showed the feasibility of using deep learning to track targets in x-ray fluoroscopic projection images without the aid of markers. The technique can be valuable for both pre- and during-treatment real-time target verification using fluoroscopic imaging in lung SBRT treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.