ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022
Update of environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations of EFSA (2016) on EU teosinte.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scientific assessment of the 2024 post-market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 (application GMFF-2022-6232).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of the 2023 post-market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Complexity Meets Risk-The Next Generation of Genome-Edited Plants Challenges Established Concepts for Environmental Risk Assessment in the EU.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DAS1131 (application GMFF-2021-1530).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DP51291 (application GMFF-2021-0071).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of the 2022 post-market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DP910521 (application GMFF-2021-2473).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 95275 (application GMFF-2022-5890).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 94804 (application GMFF-2022-10651).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-159).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DP915635 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-172).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize DP23211 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-163).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Assessment of the 2021 post-market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 × MIR162 × MIR604 × MON 89034 × 5307 × GA21 and 30 subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2018-149).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Monitoring Insect Resistance to Bt Maize in the European Union: Update, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Journal of economic entomology · 2023Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 × T25 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2016-137).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87419 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2017-140).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 95379 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-170).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teosinte, wild maize relatives originating from Mexico and Central America, emerged as a noxious agricultural weed in France and Spain. In 2016, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) issued a technical report that assessed the available scientific information on teosinte for its relevance for the environmental risk assessment (ERA) and risk management (RM) of genetically modified (GM) maize MON810, Bt11, 1507 and GA21 for cultivation. It was concluded that the impact of insect resistance and/or herbicide tolerance in GM teosinte hybrid progeny (potentially acquired through hybridisation between GM maize and teosinte) on target and non-target organisms, the abiotic environment and biogeochemical cycles would be very low under EU conditions. Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA evaluated whether the ERA conclusions and RM recommendations of EFSA (2016) remain applicable, or require revision in light of new scientific evidence on teosinte that has become available since the publication of EFSA (2016). A protocol was developed to clarify the interpretation of the terms of reference of the mandate and make them operational. The assessment relied on evidence retrieved via an extensive literature search and from reports of the Competent Authorities of France and Spain, and on hearing expert testimonies. A limited collection of 18 publications of varying relevance and quality was retrieved and assessed. Based on this evidence, it is concluded that the ERA conclusions and RM recommendations of EFSA (2016) remain applicable, except those pertaining to the use of glyphosate-based herbicides on maize GA21 which should be considered under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. In infested agricultural areas (especially in regions where maize MON810 is widely grown), weed management measures implemented to monitor, control and/or eradicate teosinte must remain in place, as they will contribute to further reduce the low vertical gene flow potential between GM maize and EU teosinte.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.