Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception.

Michael P Toglia, Joseph Schmuller, Britni G Surprenant, Katherine C Hooper, Natasha N DeMeo, Brett L Wallace

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

[Trauma and memory-A contribution to the current debate in law and psychotherapy].Der Nervenarzt · 2024
Review
False memories in forensic psychology: do cognition and brain activity tell the same story?Frontiers in psychology · 2024
Review
Artificial neural network models: implementation of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based spontaneous lie detection in an interactive scenario.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
Article
Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying false memories: misinformation, distortion or erroneous configuration?AIMS neuroscience · 2023
Review

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael P TogliaDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Joseph SchmullerDepartment of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

Britni G SurprenantDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

Katherine C HooperDepartment of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

Natasha N DeMeoDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Brett L WallaceSchool of Psychology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DRM (Deese-Roediger-McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g.,

Indexed as

activation-monitoring theorycognitive neurosciencedeceptionDRM paradigmfNIRSfuzzy trace theorylexical decision taskspreading activation

Identifiers

PMID35386904

DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2022.721961

PMCPMC8979290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.