Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35386875›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Moose in our neighborhood: Does perceived hunting risk have cascading effects on tree performance in vicinity of roads and houses?

Anne C Mehlhoop, Bram Van Moorter, Christer M Rolandsen, Dagmar Hagen, Aksel Granhus, Rune Eriksen, Thor Harald Ringsby, Erling J Solberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne C MehlhoopNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0748-7515
Bram Van MoorterNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-1993
Christer M RolandsenNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-0385
Dagmar HagenNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4257-5625
Aksel GranhusNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO) Ås Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1713-9928
Rune EriksenNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO) Ås Norway.
Thor Harald RingsbyDepartment of Biology Centre of Biodiversity Dynamics Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-7592
Erling J SolbergNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-2011
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research · NONorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like large carnivores, hunters both kill and scare ungulates, and thus might indirectly affect plant performance through trophic cascades. In this study, we hypothesized that intensive hunting and enduring fear of humans have caused moose and other forest ungulates to partly avoid areas near human infrastructure (perceived hunting risk), with positive cascading effects on recruitment of trees. Using data from the Norwegian forest inventory, we found decreasing browsing pressure and increasing tree recruitment in areas close to roads and houses, where ungulates are more likely to encounter humans. However, although browsing and recruitment were negatively related, reduced browsing was only responsible for a small proportion of the higher tree recruitment near human infrastructure. We suggest that the apparently weak cascading effect occurs because the recorded browsing pressure only partly reflects the long-term browsing intensity close to humans. Accordingly, tree recruitment was also related to the density of small trees 5-10 years earlier, which was higher close to human infrastructure. Hence, if small tree density is a product of the browsing pressure in the past, the cascading effect is probably stronger than our estimates suggest. Reduced browsing near roads and houses is most in line with risk avoidance driven by fear of humans (behaviorally mediated), and not because of excessive hunting and local reduction in ungulate density (density mediated).

Indexed as

Alces alcesbrowsinghuman impactsroadstree recruitmenttrophic cascadeungulates

Identifiers

PMID35386875
PMCPMC8977646
OpenAlexW4224020313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.